[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: Who's developing AspectJ? WAS: [aspectj-dev] Status of IDE in tegration support in compiler
|
Thanks for the answer Jim, that's exactly the info I was looking for.
> (of course,
> writing a book about AspectJ couldn't hurt ;-)
Oooh, that sounds easy...I'll get right on it :)
Nick
--- Jim.Hugunin@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> The list of committers should be on the developers section of the web
> pages. We'll put it there shortly. The current committers are the
> original PARC team; Erik Hilsdale, Jim Hugunin, Wes Isberg and Mik
> Kersten. All of us are now working on AspectJ primarily on our own time.
> We expect that Adrian Colyer from IBM Hursley will join the committer
> list very soon. The project is governed under the eclipse technology
> project charter:
> http://eclipse.org/technology/technology-charter.html
>
> The current development plan is very simple. Remove all bugs and make a
> high-quality 1.1.0 release as soon as possible. When we get to 1.1.0
> we'll need a new plan.
>
> We look forward to new developers who can grow into committers. We have
> yet to receive our first patch from a non-committer, but that's not very
> surprising considering that we only made public cvs access available a
> month ago. The quality of the bug reports we've received on 1.1betaX
> have been very high and easy to reproduce. The submission of these
> reports is a great way to make a contribution to the project (of course,
> writing a book about AspectJ couldn't hurt ;-)
>
> -Jim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lesiecki Nicholas [mailto:ndlesiecki@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:25 PM
> To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Who's developing AspectJ? WAS: [aspectj-dev] Status of IDE
> integration support in compiler
>
> Hello all,
>
> I subscribe to this list in part because I'm intensely interested in the
> details of AspectJ. However, I'm not an AspectJ developer. (In part this
> is
> because I don't have the requisite expertise to work on something like
> the
> compiler). The comment at the end of Jim's email:
>
> > Someone needs to figure out what the correct behavior should be in a
> > tricky case like this and implement it.
>
> got me thinking. Who is currently developing on AspectJ? I'm guessing
> that
> Jim and Erik's days of high contribution will likely end with the release
> of 1.1. Is there a list of committers? Is anyone other than the original
> PARC team regularly contributing source? How is the project governed? (Is
> there an Eclipse management style that it subscribes to?) It may be too
> early to ask these questions. I'm just rather curious.
>
> Cheers,
> nick
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com