Re: [aperi-dev] Migrating to Derby 10.3.1.4

[Tom Guinane <guinane@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Chris, 
Per the last question, Eclipse legal
drives this activity.  They do not provide timeframes, just best can
do based on their workload.  In the past it took several months to
get CQ's approved.  Lately, they have been pretty quick, but it depends
on what they find with their pedigree scans.  They are currently active
on this request.  An initial scan has just been done and the output
needs to be evaluated by the lawyer.  
 
Cheers,   Tom
___________________________________________
Tom Guinane     Aperi Project Lead     IBM ARC  
  408-927-2104     guinane@xxxxxxxxxx     http://www.eclipse.org/aperi/

Chris King/Chicago/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: aperi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/26/2007 12:57 PM

Please respond to
Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [aperi-dev] Migrating to Derby 10.3.1.4

My responses below Tom's.
_________________

Chris King
Information Development - Aperi 
chriskng@xxxxxxxxxx
Aperi: http://www.eclipse.org/aperi/index.php

Tom
Guinane/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS

Tom Guinane/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: aperi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/26/2007 02:32 PM

Please respond to
Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [aperi-dev] Migrating to Derby 10.3.1.4

Responses below yours... 

Cheers, Tom
___________________________________________
Tom Guinane Aperi Project Lead IBM ARC 408-927-2104 guinane@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.eclipse.org/aperi/

Todd Singleton/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: aperi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/24/2007 05:08 PM

Please respond to
Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [aperi-dev] Migrating to Derby 10.3.1.4

Responses below... 

Todd Singleton
Software Engineer, Tivoli, IBM
Menlo Park, CA
email: toddsing@xxxxxxxxxx

Tom Guinane/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: aperi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/24/2007 11:22 AM

Please respond to
Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[aperi-dev] Migrating to Derby 10.3.1.4

Hi Todd, 
I've got a couple of questions regarding the migration to the next level
of Derby, 10.3.1.4, for Aperi. We have decided we need to go to this level
to address some critical bugs. We are pursuing to get approve from Eclipse
legal to bundle. But, if that does not happen in time, what impact are
we imposing on our users? Actually, I have two questions on this:

1) What would a new Aperi user experience if they have to manually download
and install Derby 10.3.1.4? Is the installation straightforward?
TODD> We'd have to test it and determine. But my thoughts are that it
would not be too big of a deal. It should be very straightforward, simple
file replace. We could also repackage it in the download. 
TOM>> Thanks. Hans, hopefully we will not have to go down this path,
but we need to monitor carefully.
CHRIS >>> Please keep me updated on this process when it is determined.
I'll make sure to include it in the installation instructions.

2) What would an existing Aperi user experience if they are migrating from
Derby 10.1.2.1 to 10.3.1.4? Bundled or not, does Derby address upward migration
during the install? 
TODD> Not sure if we really need to support this scenario (not sure
if we have any crucial deployments). However, this is a scenario that we
would need to test. But derby would not address migration during installation,
no. It would be a manual process. 
TOM>> Thanks. Hans, either way, this will have to be addressed in
test.
CHRIS >>> We'll also need to document this migration process,
most likely in the installation instructions.

Also, are you suggesting that this is a "go". Should we update
the version now? Are you opening a defect/feature for this?
TOM>> From what I understand, we really do not have much of a choice.
Without the migration we have serious errors. So, yes, it is a go. However
we do not yet have approval to bundle it. That is currently in progress
and being tracked with IPzilla 1830. 
CHRIS >>> Is there a timetable for this, and will it likely be
approved in time to meet the requirments of the R4 schedule?


Cheers, Tom
___________________________________________
Tom Guinane Aperi Project Lead IBM ARC 408-927-2104 guinane@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.eclipse.org/aperi/_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev
_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev
_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev

_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev