Re: [aperi-dev] R0.3 RC1 results so far

[Tom Guinane <guinane@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dave, 
That looks like the right list.  The
only thing missing would be to assign owners to each item and define targets
for resolution.  Were you planing on doing that or should I call a
meeting?

Cheers,   Tom
___________________________________________
Tom Guinane     Aperi Project Lead     IBM    
408-284-4795     guinane@xxxxxxxxxx     http://www.eclipse.org/aperi/

"David Wolfe" <2dwolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: aperi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/15/2007 09:46 AM

Please respond to
Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Aperi Development" <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[aperi-dev] R0.3 RC1 results so far

If I am reading right it sounds like:

1) The instructions for windows are still a bit confusing, but once worked
through produce a running install.
2) The instructions for Linux don't exist, but one can derive the from
the windows instructions and eventually arrive at a running install 
3) There are 2 defects outstanding for Linux, one about the default admin
group (bugzilla?), one about the scsi disks (176657)
4) There is general confusion about what 3rd party bits are or are not
bundled with the install versus what is and is not downloaded by cfgaperi

Am I missing anything?

-DaveW_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev