Re: [aperi-dev] Wednesday meeting topics

[Ted Slupesky <slupesky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Attendees: Dave, John, Tom, Ted, Rodica,
Eric Anzeres, Craig, Christoph 

We reviewed the use cases. John (C)
will provide feedback to aperi-dev regarding possible prioritization, we
we agreed the curent use case document doesn't reflect at all which unmet
use cases are more important than others.

We discussed the new MOF and concluded
we don't need to do anything in Aperi regarding it, as we're not very sensitive
(as SMI clients) regarding underlying CIM MOF changes.

We touched on changes coming from the
work for SLES 10. Craig will update us in a later meeting. The goal is
to maintain a single Linux native build that works on all the Linux platforms
we want to work on. At the moment, the changes Craig has been working on
for SLES 10 do not allow compilation on some other platforms; we have more
work to do before we have a specific recommendation.

--
Ted Slupesky | Eclipse Aperi Project Lead | IBM: 349-5413 | External: (503)
820-3853

Ted Slupesky/Portland/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: aperi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

03/12/2007 06:11 PM

Please respond to
Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[aperi-dev] Wednesday meeting topics

- A draft of the Aperi use cases is available at 
        http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Aperi_Use_Cases
  I'd like to walk through them. 

- Per John Crandall, let's discuss the new CIM MOF and see if there's any
action to be taken in Aperi. 

--
Ted Slupesky | Eclipse Aperi Project Lead | IBM: 349-5413 | External: (503)
820-3853
_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev