| [amalgam-dev] Re: oAW in Amalgam |
Markus, Typically components share the newsgroup of the containing and users are asked prefix subjects headings, for example with [oAW]. After alll, you have things like Xtext, XPand, and MWE spead across multiple projects and there are newsgroups for those projects already too. So I expect you'd use news://news.eclipse.org/eclipse.modeling.amalgam There is already a real CVS component as well: (Embedded image moved to file: pic13846.jpg) It's not clear what you mean by glue code. I imagine most if not all the code is associated directly with Xpand, Xtend, Xtext, and MWE. What else, specifically, is there that would not logically belong with the former components? Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx 905-413-3265 (t/l 313) "Markus Voelter" <voelter@googlema il.com> To "Richard Gronback" 04/02/2008 07:19 <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>, AM voelter@xxxxxxx, amalgam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx cc Please respond to "Jean Bezivin" voelter@xxxxxxx <jean.bezivin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Subject Re: oAW in Amalgam Hi Rich, > I'd say no proposal is necessary, just a patch applied to Bugzilla (the > usual process). This way, we can take a look at the extent of what's > being proposed. For now, the only artifact in the Amalgam repo is an EPP > definition for the general Modeling package. I expect an "oAW" > definition that would include Xpand/Xtend/MWE/Xtext is the place to > start? yes, but we do need real a repository where we can put the "glue" code as well as a newsgroup for support. Markus > > Thanks, > Rich > > > On 4/1/08 11:34 AM, "Ed Merks" <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Markus, >> >> I imagine it would involve just a feature definition for pulling >> together a >> subset of the things Amalgam itself is already pulling together. I >> doubt >> it needs to be a separate project. Rich is the lead for the project, so >> it's best to take direction from him on how to proceed? I wonder what >> steps need to be taken to ensure that oAW is an Eclipse brand and that >> we >> don't get flak from the foundation about it... >> >> >> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA >> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx >> 905-413-3265 (t/l 313) >> >> >> >> >> >> "Markus Voelter" >> <voelter@googlema >> il.com> >> To >> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA >> 04/01/2008 11:05 >> cc >> AM "Richard Gronback" >> <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>, >> "Jean Bezivin" >> Please respond to <jean.bezivin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> voelter@xxxxxxx >> Subject >> oAW in Amalgam >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Ed, >> >> what are the next steps we need to take to get oAW >> under Amalgam, as discussed at EclipseCon? Do we need >> to write a project proposal? >> >> Thanks, >> Markus >> >> -- >> >> Markus Völter >> >> voelter - ingenieurbüro für softwaretechnologie >> Grabenstrasse 4, 73033 Goeppingen, Germany >> Tel. +49 (0) 171 / 86 01 869 >> Email: voelter@xxxxxxx >> >> Web: http://www.voelter.de >> Blog: http://www.voelter.de/blog >> Podcast: http://www.se-radio.net >> >> PGP Public Key: http://www.voelter.de/data/MarkusVoelter.gpg >> >> > -- Markus Völter voelter - ingenieurbüro für softwaretechnologie Grabenstrasse 4, 73033 Goeppingen, Germany Tel. +49 (0) 171 / 86 01 869 Email: voelter@xxxxxxx Web: http://www.voelter.de Blog: http://www.voelter.de/blog Podcast: http://www.se-radio.net PGP Public Key: http://www.voelter.de/data/MarkusVoelter.gpg
Attachment:
pic13846.jpg
Description: JPEG image
