RE: [alf-dev] ALF UDDI requirements

["Krishna, Mohana (Cognizant)" <Mohana.Krishna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I completely agree that UDDI is not a core requirement for ALF. While
not being convinced with the UDDI option, I did not bring it up earlier
as I assumed that I may be missing some subtle requirement.

I also believe that A UDDI service as part of the ALF site is also a
mere convenience and imagine that ALF would be aggregating services from
multiple UDDI registries.


Regards,
Mohana.


-----Original Message-----
From: alf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:alf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kelly Shaw
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 8:48 PM
To: alf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [alf-dev] ALF UDDI requirements

Looking at the UDDI spec, I'm not certain if we should include it as a
standard part of ALF. Sure, UDDI would be handy to have around to
categorize
and organize available web services, but is that a requirement for ALF?
I
don't think so since anyone can build a BPEL service flow without having
their web services organized.

We should spend our available time and resources on features that are
necessary, so I suggest we drop UDDI from ALF version 1.0.

However, I believe we should stand up a UDDI service on the ALF site so
vendors and other contributors can register their services.

What does everyone else think?



_______________________________________________
alf-dev mailing list
alf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/alf-dev













This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

  Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com