[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [ajdt-dev] Problem with Project dependency / Aspect Path in Eclipse
|
- From: Andrew Eisenberg <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:27:35 -0700
- Delivered-to: ajdt-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ye14eo9XkNamUXYcJQnWbM5sqkNm1UIfRwDFZx5MV5w=; b=s4LF5KjAT4Nj3samnkdmWwu8f+R7glV+KyDzQm2vm6n7vZWtPLVCOGhRRXrp8iUt4C X3r0vxXk1vhVWOtLeX9jftMobainTaSTisFNd7V3hHvIoQFZT7wyTmSh265YyzquiF2o Vv0tSc4nmhHT/1DFBIqSxb7tY5G6+T0bBgMbc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=k2UWlQihZO9JEanJlWkthkgzm9JVseae0pMfKTOYNDlak5sqYd4oIlvoHm1fitk8Sy HAh/ipE9fBIP9insXaUZQ0cpOLKnWvwlnHJaJv42rhQ2QV7nRGWnUhErncUvpMir7pA1 RtoS6+39VYAKQaA44CKcxBlByCGUw7vwtgjJE=
Thanks for the test case. Made it easy to find the problem.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:17 PM, prg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<prg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> prg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:
>> just hit a strange behaviour;
> ...
>> about to reorganise a huge (AspectJ) project in Eclipse, to split
>> it into a series of dependent projects. Now, the very basic set
>> "Commons" contains some Aspects, which need to be applied to the
>> other parts.
>
>> Anyhow, building the dependent Project "Part-1" causes the message
>> "The project was not built since it depends on Part-1,
>> which has build path errors".
>
>> Andrew Eisenberg wrote:
>>> There's nothing out of the ordinary that I can see in your project
>>> files. In order to narrow down and see if AJDT is the problem, can
>>> you try removing the AJ nature from both projects and see if the
>>> build path problem goes away?
>
>>> If it does, then can you add the natures back, and then just remove
>>> commons from the classpath of Part-1? If the problem goes away
>>> under either of these circumstances, I'll raise a bug and try to
>>> get a dev build out there that will provide some better
>>> diagnostics.
>
> See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=288395
>
>
> Andrew, many thanks for resolving this issue,
> which has bitten us quite badly!
>
> I'm writing this short note, as the Problem might be of general
> interest. As it turned out, the root cause where some spurious
> Entries in the *Manifiest* hidden within some of the dozens of
> library Jars in our project's dependencies: Some of them declared
> an "Classpath" setting, which of course no one ever notices or
> cares about ;-)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Hermann Vosseler
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
>