Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ajdt-dev] AJDT speed with multiple projects

Sebastien, I have moved this to discussion in a bug report as that is
easier, see:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=221427

I have pasted in your comments and then added my own. Basically I need
to know what scenario you are testing, which way round the
dependencies are.

Andy.

On 04/03/2008, Sebastien Tardif <stardif@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy,
>
>  After more understanding it seems there is nothing more to apply to the
>  source code from what is already included in 1.5.4 final. So I'm still
>  stock with the problem.
>
>  How do we get debugIncrementalStates to be true to debug the problem?
>
>  How do we trace AJDT and components?
>
>  Only space and modification of method body avoid full build after this
>  message: Preparing for build: not going to be incremental because path
>  change detected (one of classpath/aspectpath/inpath/injars)
>
>  Addition or removal of constant or method is triggering batch build.
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Sebastien Tardif
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 3:17 PM
>  To: 'ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
>
> Subject: RE: [ajdt-dev] AJDT speed with multiple projects
>
>  Andy,
>
>  >I was thinking I would do a 1.4 update just for you but I can't because
>  Eclipse 3.2 won't seem to run on my Mac.
>
>
> Thanks to have tried.
>
>
>  > However, you may be able to just drop in the 1.5.4 final components
>  into AJDT1.4.2.
>
>
> We have tried the 1.5.4 final components but that didn't work. After
>  reviewing the patch from
>  https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166580 it seems that we
>  also need a small adaptation to AJDE, to plug
>  src/org/aspectj/ajde/internal/OutputLocationAdapter.java. The bug said
>  that this have been done under AJDT 1.5.0.200701100718 for Eclipse
>  3.3M4.
>
>  We are currently trying to make the change to AJDE for Eclipse 3.2.
>
>
> >However, if you have mixed projects (some java, some Aj) I don't think
>  this will address your problems...
>
>
> We have tried will all projects converted to AJ for the project we can
>  convert. However, we are not allowed to convert EAR projects. Hopefully,
>  EAR projects are not required, after all they don't compile Java code.
>  That didn't solve our issue.
>
>  I let you know the result of our custom AJDE for Eclipse 3.2.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>  From: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>  On Behalf Of Andy Clement
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 1:16 PM
>  To: ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] AJDT speed with multiple projects
>
>
> Hello Sebastien,
>
>  On 03/03/2008, Sebastien Tardif <stardif@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > Thanks for your prompt response.
>  >
>  >  In the log we have provided, we added only a space so all the
>  dependent
>  >  did incremental build, but when we add or remove a constant the
>  >  dependent do full build. We only use one output location for each
>  >  project but they have different names and we use special project type
>  >  Web, EAR, EJB module so they may add implicit output location or
>  mix-up
>  >  the logic.
>  >
>  >  Like you said, we are probably impacted by
>  >
>  > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166580
>
>  I was thinking I would do a 1.4 update just for you but I can't
>  because Eclipse 3.2 won't seem to run on my Mac.  However, you may be
>  able to just drop in the 1.5.4 final components into AJDT1.4.2.  If
>  you are interested in trying this, you need to update 3 plugins in
>  your eclipse/plugins folder with new versions from CVS. (Backup what
>  you are replacing first...)
>
>  org.aspectj.ajde_<whatever is the latest version>
>  In this plugin you need to update ajde.jar - the 1.5.4 version is here:
>  http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.ajdt/AJDT_src/org.a
>  spectj.ajde/ajde.jar?revision=1.79&root=Tools_Project&pathrev=AJDT151
>
>  org.aspectj.runtime
>  In this plugin you need to update aspectjrt.jar - the 1.5.4 version is
>  here:
>  http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.ajdt/AJDT_src/org.a
>  spectj.runtime/aspectjrt.jar?root=Tools_Project&view=co&pathrev=AJDT151
>
>  org.aspectj.weaver
>  In this plugin you need to update aspectjweaver.jar - the 1.5.4 version
>  is here:
>  http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.ajdt/AJDT_src/org.a
>  spectj.weaver/aspectjweaver.jar?root=Tools_Project&view=co&pathrev=AJDT1
>  51
>
>  However, if you have mixed projects (some java, some Aj) I don't think
>  this will address your problems...
>
>  >  We actually have a mix, because we wanted to minimize the overhead of
>  >  AJDT so we have excluded the projects we think are unlikely to need
>  to
>  >  be woven.
>
>  Perfectly understandable, I know this is a common case.
>
>  >  Is it always a problem to mix the project types? Do we have a precise
>  >  description somewhere of the combination having or not the problem?
>
>  Anytime you have a dependency between the two, you get this problem.
>  Whether it is the Java project or the Aj project that is being built,
>  they won't understand what happened in the project they depend on
>  because of the incompatible incremental state objects.  I know it
>  seems obvious that the class file is the same as before, but the state
>  of what happened during a compilation is wrapped up inside a state
>  object.
>
>  The more straightforward case we can fix is where an AspectJ project
>  depends on a Java project - because we can reflect on the JDT state
>  object and enable the AspectJ project to query what changed - ie. was
>  it a structural change, does this AspectJ project need to rebuild?
>  The hard case to fix is where a JDT project depends on an AspectJ
>  project, we cannot modify JDT so the best we can do is create some JDT
>  representation of the AspectJ projects status and hope we can convince
>  JDT to treat it as if it came from the JDT compiler.
>
>  I know you mentioned concerns over memory - but can you try converting
>  them all to AspectJ just to see if that improves what happens for a
>  simple whitespace change?  It should, otherwise we have a bug.
>
>  Other approaches would be to shuffle dependencies so that you don't
>  have a switch to the alternative project type half way down your chain
>  of dependencies.  If your aspectj projects are all at the top,
>  followed by all the Java projects, then you should find working in the
>  Java stuff will not cause a problem.  It is only when we cross between
>  project types down a dependency chain that you will see issues.
>
>  Andy.
>
>  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  From: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>  >  On Behalf Of Andy Clement
>  >
>  > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 11:59 PM
>  >  To: ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] AJDT speed with multiple projects
>  >
>  >
>  > On 03/03/2008, Sebastien Tardif <stardif@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  > It seems that AJDT 1.4.2.200705221209 was released before AspectJ
>  >  1.5.4
>  >  >  is released so that what is known to be fixed in AspectJ 1.5.4 may
>  >  not
>  >  >  be included in 1.5.4.200705211336.
>  >
>  >  Indeed - but I didn't think anything had gone in that would affect
>  you
>  >  during that time.  And from the query I just ran to see what was
>  fixed
>  >  in that time:
>  >
>  https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_de
>  >
>  sc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=AspectJ&target_milestone=1.5.
>  >
>  4&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssub
>  >
>  str&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboar
>  >
>  d=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailty
>  >
>  pe2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=2007-
>  >
>  05-21&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+
>  >  last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
>  >
>  >  only one thing struck me as a possible fix you didn't have:
>  >  https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166580
>  >
>  >  which is to do with incremental builds always being full builds when
>  >  using multiple output locations.  But as your information said every
>  >  build that did occur was incremental, I don't think this is affecting
>  >  you.
>  >
>  >  >  We have 22 projects in our workspace. The projects are dependents
>  >  like a
>  >  >  tree, so some depend of x projects and those x projects may depend
>  of
>  >  >  others. We have no circular references.
>  >
>  >  Do you have any java projects or are they all AspectJ projects? If
>  you
>  >  have a mixture, you might well be hitting what I recently described
>  in
>  >  another thread last week.
>  >
>  >  >  In the trace below, only a Java file was modified by adding a
>  space
>  >  so
>  >  >  the resulting *.class should be the same then there is no point to
>  >  >  involve the dependents. Do you agree?
>  >
>  >  Of course.
>  >
>  >  > Do we already have a bug logged or it's already fixed?
>  >
>  >  I had a quick look over the AJDT bugs and I can't see one.
>  >
>  >  >  We also notice that full build is often done when we expect
>  >  incremental
>  >  >  build.
>  >
>  >  This can be the case if Java/AJ projects are mixed.  If it isn't that
>  >  then it sounds like a bug.
>  >
>  >  >  We also see that AspectJ compiler is keeping a big chunk of
>  >  >  WeakReference that take around 800 megs in our RAD. One our
>  developer
>  >  >  said that if we call org.aspectj.weaver.Dump.reset() the leak will
>  >  go.
>  >  >  800 megs just for the AspectJ compiler is close to the limit a JVM
>  >  can
>  >  >  have on Windows so we cannot extend our JVM memory allocation.
>  >
>  >  I do believe I have a bug open for that somewhere - and am looking at
>  >  memory usage when I get a chance.
>  >
>  >  >  My team is complaining to me after I introduced AJDT in our big
>  >  >  government project.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Anyone is using AJDT on big software with multiple projects in the
>  >  same
>  >  >  workspace?
>  >  >
>  >  >  What's the best practice to use AspectJ with Eclipse/RAD without
>  >  AJDT?
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  >  From: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>  >  >  On Behalf Of Andy Clement
>  >  >  Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:48 PM
>  >  >  To: ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  >  Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] AJDT speed with multiple projects
>  >  >
>  >  >  I'm not planning on upgrading the Eclipse 3.2 version of AJDT any
>  >  time
>  >  >  soon - but as far as I am aware it includes all the optimizations
>  >  that
>  >  >  are in the later versions, so it wouldn't change your situation.
>  >  >
>  >  >  How are your projects dependent?  Just a big stack of AJ projects
>  >  that
>  >  >  depend on each other?
>  >  >
>  >  >  Andy.
>  >  >
>  >  >  On 28/02/2008, Sebastien Tardif <stardif@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Hi,
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > I put a space in a file and saved. I got the log below. Could I
>  >  >  optimize
>  >  >  > something? By the way, I'm stock to use Eclipse 3.2 because I
>  use
>  >  IBM
>  >  >  RAD.
>  >  >  > Is a possibility that a more recent AJDT supporting Eclipse 3.2
>  >  will
>  >  >  be
>  >  >  > built?
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:38 PM Startup information:
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    AJDT version: 1.4.2.200705221209 for Eclipse 3.2
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    AspectJ Compiler version: DEVELOPMENT
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    usingVisualiser=true
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    usingXref=true
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    usingCUprovider=false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    doneAutoOpenXRefViewC:/cc_views_dr_5_1_0_0/workspace =
>  >  >  > true
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    org.aspectj.ajdt.core.compiler.weaver.XNoInline = true
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    ajde.version.at.previous.startup = @AJDEVERSION@
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >    org.aspectj.ajdt.core.compiler.weaver.XNotReweavable =
>  >  >  > true
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:49 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:49 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:49 PM Project=svcapp, kind of build requested=Incremental
>  >  AspectJ
>  >  >  > compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:49 PM build: Examined delta - source file changes in
>  required
>  >  >  project
>  >  >  > svcapp
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:50 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:50 PM Starting incremental compilation loop 1 of possibly 5
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:51 PM Timer event: 1687ms: Time to first compiled message
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:51 PM Timer event: 1718ms: Time to first woven message
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:51 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:51 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:51 PM Timer event: 1890ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Timer event: 390ms: Create element map (1 rels in
>  >  project:
>  >  >  > svcapp)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Types affected during build = 1
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (2 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Timer event: 2765ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Project=svcCommon, kind of build
>  requested=Incremental
>  >  >  AspectJ
>  >  >  > compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:52 PM Timer event: 437ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 63ms: Create element map (0 rels in
>  >  project:
>  >  >  > svcCommon)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 625ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Project=imProvisioningHub, kind of build
>  >  >  requested=Incremental
>  >  >  > AspectJ compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 375ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 0ms: Create element map (0 rels in
>  project:
>  >  >  > imProvisioningHub)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 421ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Project=ctIvrWeb, kind of build requested=Incremental
>  >  >  AspectJ
>  >  >  > compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 344ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 0ms: Create element map (0 rels in
>  project:
>  >  >  > ctIvrWeb)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Timer event: 375ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:53 PM Project=connectors, kind of build
>  requested=Incremental
>  >  >  AspectJ
>  >  >  > compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:54 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:54 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:55 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:55 PM Timer event: 1062ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:56 PM Timer event: 781ms: Create element map (0 rels in
>  >  project:
>  >  >  > connectors)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:56 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:56 PM Timer event: 2359ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:56 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:56 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:56 PM Project=ejbapp, kind of build requested=Incremental
>  >  AspectJ
>  >  >  > compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:56 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM Timer event: 702ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM Timer event: 141ms: Create element map (0 rels in
>  >  project:
>  >  >  > ejbapp)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM Timer event: 1000ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:57 PM Project=ctWebClient, kind of build
>  requested=Incremental
>  >  >  AspectJ
>  >  >  > compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM Timer event: 906ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM Timer event: 218ms: Create element map (1 rels in
>  >  project:
>  >  >  > ctWebClient)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM Timer event: 1437ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:58 PM Project=clusteringmdb, kind of build
>  >  requested=Incremental
>  >  >  > AspectJ compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 328ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 0ms: Create element map (0 rels in
>  project:
>  >  >  > clusteringmdb)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 344ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  ========================================================================
>  >  >  ===================
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Build kind = AUTOBUILD
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Project=AppGUI, kind of build requested=Incremental
>  >  AspectJ
>  >  >  > compilation
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Preparing for build: planning to be an incremental
>  build
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM AspectJ reports build successful, build was:
>  INCREMENTAL
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM AJDE Callback: finish. Was full build: false
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 718ms: Total time spent in AJDE
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 0ms: Create element map (0 rels in
>  project:
>  >  >  AppGUI)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 0ms: Add markers (0 markers)
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > 5:46:59 PM Timer event: 734ms: Total time spent in
>  >  AJBuilder.build()
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > _______________________________________________
>  >  >  >  ajdt-dev mailing list
>  >  >  >  ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  >  >  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  >  ajdt-dev mailing list
>  >  >  ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  >  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>  >  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  >  ajdt-dev mailing list
>  >  >  ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  >  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>  >  >
>  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  ajdt-dev mailing list
>  >  ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  ajdt-dev mailing list
>  >  ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>  >
>  _______________________________________________
>  ajdt-dev mailing list
>  ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>  _______________________________________________
>  ajdt-dev mailing list
>  ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>


Back to the top