[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [ajdt-dev] Bugzilla/inbox response concerns
|
- From: "Matt Chapman" <mpchapman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:27:34 +0100
- Delivered-to: ajdt-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pOAcrDxsoaWGkA4Ih73mp5+GDNqn2WmAG/qotr2eW4spUx7QPyhEKymqMyoSNqlLJ30NHRzNRjUhdRN7h6tm/r772/aKapYnaBemnGe6BtmvZnOfkwu0hqHI+dQZ6Tte39GRUZYyAg6UWrRh7VGivfSrfWS0RHQa3aw6tIpuyLY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JKqS156umtrvfglzxNaSsl8aHHWA/cVVJ3xLwiAEnacpb9ExLrShr99S35SuHcXF+NQ4kHDIVl/ZjuRHkxI9ddfeJ7J9e8jty0iW0T0RF7ElIYhXKFDP/+MufmPLEfHFZTl4gU1Psd7viHpzcSHCzcF1rljhP/7ot4Z79MrERYE=
Actually, it is more likely to be a compiler problem. Any further
information you could provide to help narrow the problem down would be
good, such as a test project, or at least your .classpath file.
Regards,
Matt.
On 05/08/07, Neale Upstone <neale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ah.. ... that could explain... it's
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=196658 and
> it's under AspectJ, perhaps incorrectly!
>
> All the best,
>
> Neale
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Chapman wrote:
> Hi Neale,
>
> I haven't noticed this bug on the AJDT queue. What's the number?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt.
>
> On 05/08/07, Neale Upstone <neale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to raise a concern, hopefully without offending a lot of hard
> working volunteers.
>
> As far as I can tell, no one has been reading and responding to the AJDT
> inbox in the last few weeks, and I'm seriously considering abandoning AJ due
> to what I consider a showstopper:
> - full build on each modification
> - having to restart JVM when debugging, as hot code replace is prevented
> because of hte full rebuild.
>
> As someone who's new to AspectJ, I had the impression that it had a fair
> deal of support as with other Eclipse projects... with perhaps some full
> time staff.
>
> Is this not the case?
>
> I've reported a bug, as have many others, and it would be really useful if
> someone were triaging them and getting any other information required from
> people like me, before we've given up and gone elsewhere.
>
> Hope this doesn't land as too much of an insult... certainly not meant that
> way... just feeling a little frustrated at inputting bugs into a black hole.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neale
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
>