Re: [ajdt-dev] Overhaul AJDT EventTrace facilities (bug 136132)

[Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>]

#: Matt Chapman changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date: 4/13/2006 8:14 PM) :#
> If we were to do an AJDT 1.3.2, it would primarily be a bug fix
> release. This overhaul involved a lot of code changes, so it would be
> time consuming to backport. The event trace capabilities in 1.3.1 are
> not that dissimilar, it's just that this new version gives us more
> flexibility going forward.
>
> Matt.
>
> On 13/04/06, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > By reading this one I got scared by the one in my version :-) (1.3.1). Is it possible to push these
> > changes in a 1.3.1 version?
> >
> > ./alex
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev

I thought you were mentioning some big optimizations in terms of memory footprint and other specific 
optimizations. If I got it all wrong, sorry 'bout it.

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.