Re: [ajdt-dev] AOP question / wormhole

["Marco Mistroni" <mmistroni@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Ron,
  sorry for bothering you again...
ok i decided to go for the percflow approach you mentioned.
i have one additional question: my EJB aspect indeed will try to call LoginAspect for getting the current user.
Is it so that also the EJB aspect need to be with a percflow association, or can i have EJBAspect with default association
and loginAspect with percflow association?

will it make any difference?

thanks in advance and regards
 marco

On 2/16/06, Ron Bodkin <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

See http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-users/msg00700.html http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-users/msg00716.html

 

See also http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-users/msg00792.html although I think the issue Mark ran into related to advising the user code, rather than advising the container-generated proxy code. I didn't have time to set up a realistic test environment to try it out … I'd be interested to know if you make this work…

 

---

From: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marco Mistroni
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:20 AM
To: AspectJ Development Tools developer discussions
Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] AOP question / wormhole

 

Hello Ron,
  
>>(*) I posted to this mailing list a while ago a way to pass extra context to
>>distributed EJB's with an aspect. You might also consider using J2EE
>>security and getting the user's principal from that.

can you point me to your post mentioned above?

thanks and regards
 marco

_______________________________________________
ajdt-dev mailing list
ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev