Community
Participate
Working Groups
See bug 20061 for complete details. We use an ArrayList to store internal details when writing the registry cache file. Some applications have very large registries. The ArrayList scheme, is therefore, too time consuming. Some other scheme (hashmap?) needs to be considered.
Note that we need to review our data structure list for reading the registry cache as well. Investigate post 2.0.
Have changed the writer to use a HashMap instead of ArrayList. Re-visit both reading and writing post 2.0
Backed out of change. Reverted back to using ArrayList. Need to review Reader code since ExtensionPoints are always being added to the object table and not indexed if they are in a fragment.
Working on resolution now.
Fixed for release 2.0.1 (in R2_0_1 stream). Fix yet to be applied to main stream (HEAD).
Fix now applied to main stream (HEAD).