Bug 6538

Summary:	searchDeclarationsOf* incorrect
Product:	[Eclipse Project] JDT	Reporter:	Adam Kiezun <akiezun>
Component:	Core	Assignee:	Jerome Lanneluc <jerome_lanneluc>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3
Version:	2.0
Target Milestone:	2.0 M1
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows 2000
Whiteboard:

Description Adam Kiezun

2001-12-04 04:45:28 EST

in a file 'B.java' i have:

package p;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

class A{
	int i(){
		return 0;
	}
}

class B {
	int f;
	void i(){
		y();
		List l= new ArrayList(f);
	}
	private void y(){
	}

}

class C extends A{
	public  int i(){
		return 0;
	}
}

now, use searchDeclarationsOfAccessedFields on method C::i() and you'll get
B.f for example

searchDeclarationsOfReferencedTypes on the same method gives you B::y()

both are incorrect
note also that the results are correct if the file is called, for instance, 
X.java.

Comment 1 Adam Kiezun

2001-12-04 04:47:05 EST

i wrote searchDeclarationsOfReferencedTypes but i meant 
searchDeclarationsOfSentMessages

Comment 2 Adam Kiezun

2001-12-07 10:50:39 EST

this might be related so i'll paste it here:
if you have sth like this in one cu:
package p;

class A {
}

class B extends A {
	private int f;
	private class P{}
	private void a(){}
	void m() { 
		f++;
		P p= new P();
		a();
	}	
}

and searchDeclarationsOfAccessedFields - you find none!
same for the other 2 searchDeclarationsOf* methods (in their respective test 
cases)

Comment 3 Jerome Lanneluc

2001-12-10 09:55:28 EST

These are actually 2 different problems:
1. In the original test case, we did not restrict the search to the given method 
but to its compilation unit
2. In the second one, the declaration is found in a secondary type (thus not 
visible)

Fixed the first problem by passing the given element to the DeclarationOf* 
pattern.
Fixed the second problem by looking at the compilation unit of the given element 
to find the declaring type.