Bug 64846

Summary: [CTabFolder] CTabFolder's maximize tracking indication is not cleared when view maximized
Product: [Eclipse Project] Platform Reporter: Nick Edgar <n.a.edgar>
Component: SWTAssignee: Duong Nguyen <duongn>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: steve_northover
Version: 3.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows 2000   
Whiteboard:

Description Nick Edgar CLA 2004-05-31 17:05:49 EDT
build I20040529-0105

- move the mouse over the maximize button of a view
- the white tracking rectangle appears
- click without moving the mouse
- the view is maximized, but the tracking rectangle is still visible
- move the mouse
- the tracking rectangle disappears
Comment 1 Nick Edgar CLA 2004-05-31 17:06:05 EDT
Problem does not occur when the view is restored.
Comment 2 Steve Northover CLA 2004-06-01 09:29:22 EDT
Vikki to assess and advise.
Comment 3 Veronika Irvine CLA 2004-06-01 10:39:32 EDT
I don't see the problem.

Go to the Package Explorer.  
Move the mouse over the "collapse all items" tool item.  Notice that it 
becomes "hot".
Click on the toolitem without moving the mouse.
Notice that the toolitem remains hot.

This seems to be normal toolitem behaviour.  The only time the toolitem looses 
its hotness is if it causes a dialog to be opened and the dialog takes focus.  
The minimize/maximize/restore buttons on CTabFolder are supposed to act like 
tool items.
Comment 4 Nick Edgar CLA 2004-06-01 11:22:59 EDT
The problem is that clicking on maximize moves the button elsewhere, so it is no
longer under the mouse pointer, so it should not be tracking.
Comment 5 Veronika Irvine CLA 2004-06-01 11:38:44 EDT
On Windows XP, the "hot" rectangle disappears immediately when the widget is 
maximized (if the button moves).  Will have to try this on Windows 2000.
Comment 6 Nick Edgar CLA 2004-06-01 14:56:24 EDT
I can demonstrate it on my laptop if you like.
Comment 7 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:11:16 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.