Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | Error messages with "AssignmentOperator ArrayInitializer" could be improved | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | David Audel <david_audel> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | David Audel <david_audel> |
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | markus.kell.r |
| Version: | 3.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 3.2 M6 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
If this is resolved in 1.5 branch, I wouldn't worry about it for 3.0. I saw it yesterday in HEAD.
Code like this:
class X {
void foo(int i) {
i;
}
}
produces the same error.
deferred post 3.0 reopen Fixed and tests added SyntaxErrorTest#test05() -> test06() Updated tests ComplianceDiagnoseTests ParserTest Verified using I20060328-0010 for 3.2M6 *** Bug 112542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
build 20040506 With the following test case public class X { public void foo() { (X) foo(); } } the error messages are Syntax error, insert ";" to complete BlockStatements Syntax error, insert "AssignmentOperator ArrayInitializer" to complete ArrayInitializerAssignement The corresponding grammar rule is InvalidArrayInitializerAssignement ::= PostfixExpression AssignmentOperator ArrayInitializer This rule exist to perform better diagnose for expression like x = {0} But it would not be suggested as possible correction. (original bug is bug 12287)