Summary: | [Model Explorer] [FACET] Papyrus-RT Protocol menu item is not expanded when create a protocol message from the new child menu | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Modeling] Papyrus-rt | Reporter: | smaoui asma <asma.smaoui> |
Component: | tool | Assignee: | Project Inbox <papyrusrt-inbox> |
Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | charles, peter.cigehn, sredding |
Version: | unspecified | Keywords: | Documentation, readme |
Target Milestone: | Future | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows 7 | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=480403 | ||
Whiteboard: | depends_on_papyrus | ||
Bug Depends on: | 496486 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
smaoui asma
2016-09-28 00:59:59 EDT
Could we give this Bugzilla some other name, more indicating what should be done in Papyrus-RT, instead of repeating the same name as the Papyrus Bugzilla it tracks? The notification mails from Bugzilla becomes quite confusing with two different Bugzillas with exactly the same name. Is this still an issue? (In reply to Charles Rivet from comment #2) > Is this still an issue? This is only a track of a Papyrus bug : Bug 496486. In Papyrus RT, I already proposed a workaround in Bug 480403 (0.8.0 bug). So this will still an issue until the Papyrus Bug is resolved. Assigned to RĂ©mi to reassign/close when Papyrus bug is closed. I guess that since Bug 496486, which this bug depends on, will not make its way into Neon.3, that we re-plan this one for 1.0 (or Future). I agree, we should postpone it to a later release, this is only a tracker for a Papyrus generic solution. The feature is working in our case thanks to a workaround, fixing it now or later will not affect end users. (And removing me from assignee, as I no longer assign tasks to CEA employees). Bug 496486 will not be fixed for R1 so this bug needs to go to future. |