Bug 44102

Summary:	[clean up][organize imports] organize imports should optionally remove FQNs
Product:	[Eclipse Project] JDT	Reporter:	Alvin Thompson <alvin>
Component:	UI	Assignee:	JDT-UI-Inbox <jdt-ui-inbox>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	enhancement
Priority:	P4	CC:	daniel_megert, markus.kell.r, stas
Version:	3.0	Keywords:	helpwanted
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	All
Whiteboard:

Description Alvin Thompson

2003-10-02 16:06:42 EDT

it would be nice if the 'Organize Imports' options also had the setting 'Add
import for fully-qualified name'. it would take an number, and if a fqn repeated
more than that many times in a file, an import would be added and the fqn
replaced with the short name.

thanks,
alvin

Comment 1 Olivier Thomann

2003-10-02 16:08:59 EDT

Move to JDT/UI.

Comment 2 Martin Aeschlimann

2003-10-06 09:39:55 EDT

To replace a qualified type by a import statement and the simple type name you
can currently use 'Add Import (CTRL + Chift + M) on the type's reference'.

I guess you wanted something that does it on the whole file. We don't plan to
add this feature to organize import, I think it would more be a refactoring as
the user should be asked which references are ok to simplify.

Comment 3 Alvin Thompson

2003-10-06 10:40:50 EDT

how can i transfer the rfe to the appropriate refactoring people?

Comment 4 Dirk Baeumer

2003-10-06 16:54:18 EDT

Time permitted. This is an excellent thrid party opportunity. Marked as help 
wanted.

Comment 5 Alvin Thompson

2005-08-02 12:15:10 EDT

can i reopen? it's later. :)

Comment 6 Dirk Baeumer

2005-08-02 13:00:47 EDT

No. Later means that we accept this as a valid request, but are not activly
working on it. Reopening will not change this ;-).

As said this is an excellent third party opportunity. Are you interested in
contributing this?

Comment 7 Alvin Thompson

2005-08-02 13:31:05 EDT

me? not if you want it to work right. :)

Comment 8 Denis Roy

2009-08-30 02:22:53 EDT

As of now 'LATER' and 'REMIND' resolutions are no longer supported.
Please reopen this bug if it is still valid for you.

Comment 9 Dani Megert

2013-12-04 04:38:44 EST

Comment 10 Markus Keller

2013-12-09 11:18:07 EST

See also bug 112999.