Summary: | error saving model: object not contained in a resource | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Sam Davis <sam.davis> |
Component: | Mylyn | Assignee: | Miles Parker <milesparker> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | 2.0.1 | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows 7 | ||
Whiteboard: |
Description
Sam Davis
2013-06-11 13:57:05 EDT
Thanks Sam, that looks important to fix. Yeah, for sure. This is top-priority. Though any EMF persistence related issues are worrying, I think this might be spurious or at least easily recoverable. Looking at Sam's data, everything seems to be consistent and valid. Steffen, Sam was able to recover by simply refreshing task -- thinking about downgrading P and putting to 2.0.1? Postponing to 2.0.1. If anyone sees this, please update the bug. Work-around is simply to refresh the review. I tried to reproduce by rebasing change sets but didn't run into the error. I never saw an "<Undefined>" user in the persisted repository file so I'm not sure how to get into that state. I think draft comments might have the user "<Undefined>." (In reply to comment #5) > I tried to reproduce by rebasing change sets but didn't run into the error. I > never saw an "<Undefined>" user in the persisted repository file so I'm not sure > how to get into that state. Yeah, I've never seen it either. (In reply to comment #6) > I think draft comments might have the user "<Undefined>." I just verified that this isn't the case. The only way you can have Undefined for an added comment I think is if some reason there wasn't an "added by" in the file item that was commented on, and I can't think of any reason that that would happen... It's sort of a mystery. Ok, I think I just made this happen by clicking on a URL link to a review for which I *wasn't* already a reviewer. Could explain why this one has been difficult to reproduce. Also fixed by https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/13829/ |