Summary: | [release] mylyn.docs.intent 0.8 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Community | Reporter: | Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton> | ||||
Component: | Proposals and Reviews | Assignee: | Eclipse Management Organization <emo> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | alex.lagarde | ||||
Version: | unspecified | Keywords: | Documentation | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | wayne.beaton:
pmc_approved+
|
||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
URL: | http://wiki.eclipse.org/Intent/ReleaseReview/0.8 | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Bug Depends on: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 406441 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Wayne Beaton
2013-05-23 13:44:52 EDT
Created attachment 231405 [details]
Approved IP Log
Hi Wayne, not sure about what you mean by "dummy inbox" for Bugzilla ? Intent has already a bugzilla component (here are all the bugs https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Mylyn%20Docs%20Intent&classification=Mylyn ). In regards to the release review, I have already made a draft (http://wiki.eclipse.org/Intent/ReleaseReview/0.8), it just needs to be updated (I'm currently changing bugs states acccording to the homologation results). Ok Laurent Goubet explained to me what "dummy inbox" were about, I've created a Community issue https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=408943 . (In reply to comment #3) > Ok Laurent Goubet explained to me what "dummy inbox" were about, I've > created a Community issue > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=408943 . Thanks Laurent. I poked around the wiki a bit, but couldn't find any actual documentation of dummy inboxes. So I added a little something to the Webmaster FAQ [1]. [1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Webmaster_FAQ#Dummy_Inboxes done : mylyn.intent-inbox@eclipse.org thanks for the advice! Mylyn Intent 0.8 release review is available at http://wiki.eclipse.org/Intent/ReleaseReview/0.8 If it seems OK to you, I think we can schedule the Kepler release review. Best regards, Alex Review documentation: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Intent/ReleaseReview/0.8 Not sure about which "+1" from the mylyn pmc I should reference in this issue, so here are all the +1 I got (sorry for the inconvenience) +1 from Wayne Beaton http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00184.html +1 from Chris Anisczcyk http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00185.html +1 from Mik Kersten http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00187.html (In reply to comment #8) > Not sure about which "+1" from the mylyn pmc I should reference in this > issue, so here are all the +1 I got (sorry for the inconvenience) > > +1 from Wayne Beaton > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00184.html > > +1 from Chris Anisczcyk > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00185.html > > +1 from Mik Kersten > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00187.html Inconvenience? What inconvenience. FWIW, I only need one +1 from a PMC member. Since you caught me at a good time, I decide that my +1 was good enough and when ahead and documented the approval. Thanks for being thorough. I declare this review successful! Please continue with your release. Yeay! Thanks Wayne :) |