Summary: | You should resolve this member and call getAnnotationOfType() on the result... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Tools] AspectJ | Reporter: | Andrew Clement <aclement> |
Component: | Compiler | Assignee: | aspectj inbox <aspectj-inbox> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | DEVELOPMENT | ||
Target Milestone: | 1.7.3 | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Mac OS X | ||
Whiteboard: |
Description
Andrew Clement
2013-04-03 15:32:07 EDT
Fixed up. The problem here is that we often get away with just passing annotation types around - it isn't often that users match on annotation values. Here annotation values were being used to match against the fake member created to represent an ITD, the fake member only had the annotation types put on it. I fleshed it out to also copy the values. |