Bug 394441

Summary: NumberFormatExceptions running the eval test suite
Product: [Eclipse Project] JDT Reporter: Michael Rennie <Michael_Rennie>
Component: DebugAssignee: JDT-Debug-Inbox <jdt-debug-inbox>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3    
Version: 3.7   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows 7   
Whiteboard: stalebug
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 412552    
Attachments:
Description Flags
all failure traces none

Description Michael Rennie CLA 2012-11-16 01:56:47 EST
Created attachment 223641 [details]
all failure traces

code from master

There are a few number format exceptions and two variable declaration failures when the eval test suite is run using Java 7, for example:

org.eclipse.jdt.debug.tests.eval.TestsNumberLiteral
test0x80000000(org.eclipse.jdt.debug.tests.eval.TestsNumberLiteral)
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "80000000"

	at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)

	at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:495)

	at java.lang.Integer.valueOf(Integer.java:556)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.eval.ast.engine.ASTInstructionCompiler.parseIntValue(ASTInstructionCompiler.java:3185)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.eval.ast.engine.ASTInstructionCompiler.visit(ASTInstructionCompiler.java:3145)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.NumberLiteral.accept0(NumberLiteral.java:135)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2514)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2562)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ReturnStatement.accept0(ReturnStatement.java:136)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2514)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2585)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2514)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2562)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2514)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2585)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.TypeDeclaration.accept0(TypeDeclaration.java:484)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2514)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2585)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2514)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.eval.ast.engine.ASTEvaluationEngine.createExpressionFromAST(ASTEvaluationEngine.java:565)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.eval.ast.engine.ASTEvaluationEngine.getCompiledExpression(ASTEvaluationEngine.java:348)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.eval.ast.engine.ASTEvaluationEngine.evaluate(ASTEvaluationEngine.java:133)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.debug.tests.eval.Tests.eval(Tests.java:438)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.debug.tests.eval.TestsNumberLiteral.test0x80000000(TestsNumberLiteral.java:140)

	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)

	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)

	at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)

	at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.debug.tests.AbstractDebugTest.runBare(AbstractDebugTest.java:2343)

	at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)

	at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)

	at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)

	at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)

	at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)

	at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)

	at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)

	at org.eclipse.jdt.debug.tests.EvalTestSuite$1.run(EvalTestSuite.java:244)

	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)

The attachment has all of the failure traces.
Comment 1 Eclipse Genie CLA 2020-07-30 06:10:26 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 2 Eclipse Genie CLA 2022-10-11 18:47:01 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.