Summary: | [1.7][doc] Update doc for new resource leak warnings | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Ayushman Jain <amj87.iitr> | ||||
Component: | Core | Assignee: | Stephan Herrmann <stephan.herrmann> | ||||
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | enhancement | ||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | amj87.iitr, deepakazad, markus.kell.r, Olivier_Thomann, srikanth_sankaran, stephan.herrmann | ||||
Version: | 3.7 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | 3.8 M3 | ||||||
Hardware: | Other | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Bug Depends on: | 349326 | ||||||
Bug Blocks: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ayushman Jain
2011-10-03 11:47:25 EDT
Also, the buildnotes should contain an entry for the new JavaCore API that was introduced. Created attachment 205404 [details]
doc-update
Here's the requested update for jdt_api_options.htm.
I wasn't 100% sure about the sorting in that file, so here's what I did:
- alphabetically sort in "Report Unclosed Closeable"
- insert related options directly after
Hope that's OK.
jdt_api_options.htm has been committed to CVS. (In reply to comment #1) > Also, the buildnotes should contain an entry for the new JavaCore API that was > introduced. Done as part of commit 86113d82738e778f8e0f07729ab352d227a867ad for 3.8 M3. (In reply to comment #3) > jdt_api_options.htm has been committed to CVS. CVS ? See bug 360157. (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > jdt_api_options.htm has been committed to CVS. > CVS ? See bug 360157. Is the migration complete? The bus isn't closed yet. I also noticed that the doc bundle hasn't been updated in the latest I-build so the API reference doesn't yet contain the new constants. Is there something I need to do to trigger rebuilding that, too? Well, bug 360157 comment 8 is pretty clear that the migration is done, unless there is something wrong with the repo and migration needs to be done again. Hence, the changes should be done in Git. Markus, do you have anything to add? (In reply to comment #7) > Well, bug 360157 comment 8 is pretty clear that the migration is done, unless > there is something wrong with the repo and migration needs to be done again. > Hence, the changes should be done in Git. Done, commit 649066da54acfb46f4c8738daaaa1fbc2c532bd8 Verified using build N20111022-2000. |