Summary: | suboptimal handling closing/opening projects in autobuild | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Adam Kiezun <akiezun> |
Component: | Core | Assignee: | Philipe Mulet <philippe_mulet> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | 2.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | 2.1 M5 | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Linux-GTK | ||
Whiteboard: |
Description
Adam Kiezun
2003-01-13 11:27:02 EST
Please provide a more concrete example. Also note that a closed project must be rebuilt in full since some information is discarded when its closed, thus making it impossible to handle the close/reopen case optimally. Moreover, when a project is closed, no indication is provided when it reopens in case it did change in the meantime on the file system. This is why we cannot trust a closed project to not have changed since last time we saw it. strange, i cannot reproduce anymore (it's fast now in the autobuild-on case) the concrete example was 'close org.eclipse.core.update' (binary) in self hosting workspace (with all binary except for jdt.ui, jdt.ui.test, jdt.ui.tests.refactoring in source) if nothing can be done (and i cannot reproduce), then ok for me to close Closing |