Summary: | Generate default CU advice for products | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Eclipse Project] PDE | Reporter: | Andrew Niefer <aniefer> |
Component: | Build | Assignee: | pde-build-inbox <pde-build-inbox> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | irbull |
Version: | 3.5 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows XP | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 265217 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 241441 |
Description
Andrew Niefer
2009-02-23 13:42:20 EST
Now that Simon has committed Bug 265217, should we try and create a p2.inf file for the RCP feature, and use that to start the proper bundles? We have to consider the case when there is more than 1 CU for a given host (Bug 264730. I can start on that one tomorrow. I have made these changes. If a .product has no accompanying p2.inf and the .product does not specify any start information, then we generate a default p2.inf. We generate CUs for any of the following which are in the set of bundles being built: org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator (start at level 1) org.eclipse.equinox.common (start at level 2) org.eclipse.osgi (start at -1) org.eclipse.core.runtime (start at level 4) org.eclipse.equinox.ds (start at level 1) org.eclipse.equinox.launcher (-startup) org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.* (--launcher.library) org.eclipse.update.configurator (start at level 4, see bug 235179 also set org.eclipse.update.reconcile=false) I will think about adding org.eclipse.equinox.p2.reconciler.dropins to this list. I also added a property "org.eclipse.pde.build.default=true" to every CU we generate. I suggest using this to give priority to others when we find more than 1 CU, this is the easiest way I could think of to deal with some nested feature also providing CUs for these same bundles. |