Bug 230468

Summary:	[EditorMgmt] UI Parts References Tests get 'unable to create editor' messages
Product:	[Eclipse Project] Platform	Reporter:	Eric Moffatt <emoffatt>
Component:	UI	Assignee:	Platform UI Triaged <platform-ui-triaged>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	bokowski, pwebster
Version:	3.4
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows XP
Whiteboard:

Description Eric Moffatt

2008-05-06 15:21:40 EDT

The 'EditorsReferencesTest' when running gets a 'error' editor instead of a real one for every test except the first one. The error message is 'Cannot open editor, Device is disposed'.

This is occurring -with- Boris' patch for the prefs (i.e. the RCP tests now work)

Comment 1 Eric Moffatt

2008-05-06 15:22:36 EDT

BTW, these tests appear to pass (likely because we open the error editor so the correct 'part' is active).

Comment 2 Paul Webster

2008-05-06 15:38:47 EDT

I think this is a pre-existing problem with the tests (not caused by recent changes)

PW

Comment 3 Boris Bokowski

2008-05-06 21:40:02 EDT

(In reply to comment #2)
> I think this is a pre-existing problem with the tests (not caused by recent
> changes)

Sounds likely. We might have a similar problem to what I fixed today, some cache holding on to disposed resources.

Comment 4 Eric Moffatt

2008-05-13 09:22:19 EDT

Boris, I've been watching these tests during the submission testing and I've seen it run correctly at least once (i.e. all the editors open, no 'error' parts).

Comment 5 Boris Bokowski

2009-11-17 13:01:44 EST

Remy is now responsible for watching the [EditorMgmt] component area.

Comment 6 Eclipse Webmaster

2019-09-06 16:06:49 EDT

This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.