Summary: | Inappropriate build.properties errors for yet-to-be-built extra classpath jars that fail to update when the jar is built | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Eclipse Project] PDE | Reporter: | Ed Merks <Ed.Merks> | ||||||||
Component: | UI | Assignee: | Ed Merks <Ed.Merks> | ||||||||
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | caniszczyk | ||||||||
Version: | 3.4 | Keywords: | bugday, contributed | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | 3.4 RC1 | ||||||||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||||||
OS: | Windows XP | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ed Merks
2008-04-29 15:12:48 EDT
Created attachment 98885 [details]
Mark missing plugins with the build.properties severity
Given that missing jars likely represent issues that a production build will correct later, I think problems for this should use the build.properties severity level rather than the classpath severity level; missing bundles is something more likely to represent a typo than something that a build will correct later...
This is fair to me. It's confusing to try to debug why you're getting this error when it's a problem in the build.properties file. Thanks for the patch Ed. done.
> 20080506
Created attachment 98941 [details]
Recheck the build.properties it there are PDE markers
What do you think of this idea for checking the build.properties if there are markers. I suppose we could even check if they are classpath-based markers... I'll add that if you think this has merrit...
Created attachment 98944 [details]
Recheck the build.properties it there are PDE markers
What do you think of this idea for checking the build.properties if there are markers. I suppose we could even check if they are classpath-based markers... I'll add that if you think this has merrit...
Fix available in HEAD: 2.4.0.I200805121800. |