Summary: | [jxta] Minimal ecf jxta container | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [RT] ECF | Reporter: | Pierre-Henry Perret <phperret> |
Component: | ecf.examples | Assignee: | ecf.examples-inbox <ecf.examples-inbox> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Pierre-Henry Perret <phperret> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | gunnar, remy.suen, slewis |
Version: | 1.1.0 | Keywords: | example |
Target Milestone: | 2.1.0 | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows XP | ||
Whiteboard: |
Description
Pierre-Henry Perret
2007-03-09 06:04:51 EST
Actually I think it makes more sense to refactor the existing plug-ins into smaller one. (In reply to comment #1) > Actually I think it makes more sense to refactor the existing plug-ins into > smaller one. Agreed. I really see no point in maintaining two bundles. This is for experimental purpose only. As I was saying in last post, to evaluate an core.runtime independant version of a jxta container. It is for the moment in no ways intending to replace the eclipse plugin. Changing target milestone to 1.1.0. This minimal implementation container should be enough to integrate the Jxta services in a Eclipse plugin. I have to do some clean up to make it available for Eclipse. Changing target milestone. changing target milestone to 2.1 jxta effort no longer active. Reopen if further work desired/planned. |