Bug 154332

Summary:	[annotations] Incorrect handling of java.lang annotations when matching
Product:	[Tools] AspectJ	Reporter:	Andrew Clement <aclement>
Component:	Compiler	Assignee:	Andrew Clement <aclement>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3
Version:	DEVELOPMENT
Target Milestone:	1.5.3
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows XP
Whiteboard:

Description Andrew Clement

2006-08-18 03:49:03 EDT

As raised by Mr Bodkin on the list:
Can anyone tell me why this compiling this program produces warnings for marker but not for deprecated (in a recent dev build of AJDT)? Is this just a bug? Both have runtime retention, so I would expect equivalent behavior.

 

@Deprecated @Marker

public aspect Annot {

 

    pointcut test() : within(@Marker *);// *);

   

    declare warning: staticinitialization(@Deprecated *): "deprecated";   

    declare warning: staticinitialization(@Marker *): "marker";   

   

    public static void main(String argz[]) {

        new Baz().foo();

    }

}

 

@Deprecated @Marker

class Baz {

    public void foo() {}

}

 

@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)

public @interface Marker {

 

}

Comment 1 Andrew Clement

2006-08-18 04:18:18 EDT

test and fix committed - some silly code that chopped java.lang off the front and left us with something that wouldn't resolve (doh!) - who writes this rubbish...