Summary: | Internal error during refactoring | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Davor Cubranic <davor.cubranic> | ||||
Component: | Core | Assignee: | JDT-Core-Inbox <jdt-core-inbox> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||
Priority: | P3 | Keywords: | needinfo | ||||
Version: | 3.2 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||
OS: | Windows XP | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Davor Cubranic
2006-07-06 18:37:20 EDT
Created attachment 45886 [details]
Error log showing the exception trace
Moving to JDT UI I guess you don't have a reproducible case here. From the stack trace it seems that ITypeBinding.getJavaElement() returned a IMethod. We make the assumption that ITypeBinding.getJavaElement() an only be a IType (or null). Does it also happen with 3.2 release (ie. build ID M20060629-1905)? If you can reproduce with this build, then we definitely need a test case to be able to understand what is exactly happening here... Sorry, no reproducible case, it was a one-time occurrence and I only had the log file. I'm not using 3.2 yet. OK, so close as REMIND. Please reopen if you get it again. Then provide a test case and build ID, thanks (In reply to comment #6) > Please reopen if you get it again. Then provide a test case and build ID, I will, if I get it again. However, I highly doubt that there will be a nice reproducible test case, as I haven't been able to pinpoint it this time around either, and once Eclipse was restarted, everything started working again. Do you have any advice on what to do if I see this again in order to collect as much information for you guys as possible? Information we need is: 1) the build ID you used when the problem occured 2) the content of .log file to see if there are some exception traces (this file is located in <wksp dir>/.metadata subdirectory) 3) of course a test case, but I know this is not always possible... As of now 'LATER' and 'REMIND' resolutions are no longer supported. Please reopen this bug if it is still valid for you. |