Summary: | [extract method] problem with shadowed subclass methods | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Emerson Murphy-Hill <captain.emerson> |
Component: | UI | Assignee: | JDT-UI-Inbox <jdt-ui-inbox> |
Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | b.muskalla, daniel_megert, markus.kell.r |
Version: | 3.1.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows XP | ||
Whiteboard: | stalebug |
Description
Emerson Murphy-Hill
2006-05-24 18:09:10 EDT
Move to JDT/UI Currently the refactoring correctly warns you if you try to introduce a new method in a subclass if it has the same signature as a method in the superclass. Comment 0 states the opposite direction which is currently not warned. Markus, thinking of javas open-world assumption, should we warn the user in this case? This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. Still a problem in 4.12 M1. This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. |