Bug 142001

Summary:	[batch][options] Typo in help message
Product:	[Eclipse Project] JDT	Reporter:	Maxime Daniel <maxime_daniel>
Component:	Core	Assignee:	Olivier Thomann <Olivier_Thomann>
Status:	VERIFIED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	daniel_megert, darin.eclipse, Mike_Wilson, philippe_mulet
Version:	3.2
Target Milestone:	3.2 RC5
Hardware:	PC
OS:	All
Whiteboard:

Description Maxime Daniel

2006-05-16 10:26:24 EDT

3.2 RC4
In org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch/messages.properties 1.537 (aka v_666) line 186, unQualifiedField should read unqualifiedField (lower case 'q').

Comment 1 Olivier Thomann

2006-05-16 10:39:23 EDT

This should be merged with changes for bug 141797.

Comment 2 Olivier Thomann

2006-05-16 11:28:52 EDT

I consider this as a doc change.
+1 for RC5?

Comment 3 Philipe Mulet

2006-05-16 12:03:05 EDT

The problem is that this change would invalidate translation work.
I would rather queue this for 3.3.

Comment 4 Philipe Mulet

2006-05-16 12:06:25 EDT

Oops, misread the issue.

Yes, the batch compiler help message should be fixed.
I assume "unqualifiedField" is the expected value on the command line anyway ?

Comment 5 Philipe Mulet

2006-05-16 12:08:00 EDT

+1 for 3.2RC5.

This is a typo in the batch compiler help message, where it incorrectly tells that a warning option name is "unQualifiedField" instead of "unqualifiedField", as supported by the implementation.

McQ - pls cast your vote.

Comment 6 Philipe Mulet

2006-05-16 12:08:29 EDT

Dani - pls vote

Comment 7 Philipe Mulet

2006-05-16 12:09:13 EDT

Darin - pls vote

Comment 8 Dani Megert

2006-05-16 12:13:45 EDT

+1 for 3.2 RC5.

Comment 9 Darin Wright

2006-05-16 12:15:36 EDT

+1

Comment 10 Olivier Thomann

2006-05-16 12:32:11 EDT

yes, this is right. unqualifiedField is the expected option.

Comment 11 Philipe Mulet

2006-05-17 04:48:35 EDT

Forgot to CC Mike.

Mike - can you pls vote ?

Comment 12 Mike Wilson

2006-05-17 07:38:34 EDT

+1

Comment 13 Olivier Thomann

2006-05-17 09:20:55 EDT

Fixed and released in HEAD.
To verify, print the help of the batch compiler.

Comment 14 Olivier Thomann

2006-05-19 11:23:04 EDT

Verified with I20060519-0010 for 3.2RC5