Bug 114639

Summary:	Unexpected newline when using formatter with default settings
Product:	[Eclipse Project] JDT	Reporter:	Boris Bokowski <bokowski>
Component:	Core	Assignee:	Frederic Fusier <frederic_fusier>
Status:	VERIFIED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	amj87.iitr, fg
Version:	3.1
Target Milestone:	3.6 M5
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows XP
Whiteboard:

Description Boris Bokowski

2005-11-01 15:44:00 EST

[I20051101-0010]

I am using the code formatter (Ctrl-Shift-F) on the following file, and don't
understand why it inserts a newline in between
"layout"
and
"				.addPlaceholder".

Is this expected behaviour? To me, it seems that these two lines should be
merged to just one line.

---snip---
package de.foo;

import org.eclipse.ui.IPageLayout;
import org.eclipse.ui.IPerspectiveFactory;

public class Perspective implements IPerspectiveFactory {

	public void createInitialLayout(IPageLayout layout) {
		String editorArea = layout.getEditorArea();
		layout.setEditorAreaVisible(false);
		layout.setFixed(true);

		layout.addStandaloneView(View.ID, false, IPageLayout.LEFT, 0.3f,
				editorArea);
		layout
				.addPlaceholder(CopyOfView.ID, IPageLayout.LEFT, 0.3f,
						editorArea);
		layout.addPlaceholder(Copy_2_of_View.ID, IPageLayout.LEFT, 0.3f,
				editorArea);
	}

}
---snip---

Comment 1 Florent Guillaume

2007-04-01 12:38:52 EDT

I have the same problem with Eclipse 3.3M6, an incorrect level of additional indent is done for the method name.

If you use the defaut formatter Eclipse [built-in], in the Line Wrapping section, the example for Function Calls -> Arguments is:
		Other
				.bar(100, 200, 300,
						400, 500, 600,
						700, 800, 900);
Where I'd expect something more like:
		Other.bar(100, 200, 300, 400, 500,
				600, 700, 800, 900);

Comment 2 Olivier Thomann

2007-06-21 13:11:38 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 59891 ***

Comment 3 Frederic Fusier

2010-04-14 06:59:06 EDT

It was in fact more a duplicate of bug 264112, hence it's fixed since 3.6M5.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 264112 ***

Comment 4 Ayushman Jain

2010-04-27 03:29:08 EDT

Verified for  3.6M7 using build I20100426-0852.