Bug 107045

Description Markus Keller 2005-08-15 12:36:37 EDT

I20050811-1530

class A<T extends Number> {
    void m(T t) { System.out.println("A: " + t); }
}

class B<S extends Integer> extends A<S> {
    @Override
    void m(S t) { System.out.println("B: " + t); }
}

class D extends B<Integer> {
    // @Override correctly rejected, but declaration wrongly accepted:
    void m(Number t) { System.out.println("D#m(Number): " + t); }
    @Override
    void m(Integer t) { System.out.println("D#m(Integer): " + t); }
}

public class Test {
	public static void main(String[] args) {
        D d= new D();
        d.m(1);
        d.m(1.1); // should not compile
        A<Integer> ai= d;
        ai.m(2);
        A araw= d;
        araw.m(3);
        araw.m(3.1); // should CCE @ run time
    }
}

javac 1.5.0_04: name clash: m(java.lang.Number) in override.test2.D and m(T) in
override.test2.A<java.lang.Integer> have the same erasure, yet neither overrides
the other
class D extends B<Integer> {
^