Summary: | [Javadoc] Wrong reference proposal for inner classes. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Eric Bodden <eric> | ||||
Component: | Core | Assignee: | Frederic Fusier <frederic_fusier> | ||||
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | markus.kell.r | ||||
Version: | 3.1 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | 3.3 M1 | ||||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||
OS: | Windows XP | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Eric Bodden
2005-07-11 07:23:42 EDT
Created attachment 24525 [details]
the test case
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 96237 *** Finally this is not a duplicate of bug 92367. This is a javadoc tool bug (http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4288720) and we need to decide whether we accept both syntaxes or reject one of them...? The best solution I can see for now is to accept both syntaxes. I doubt that this problem will be fixed as it exists for a long time now. I'll keep on eye on it in case Sun decides to finally fix it. Then, we'll open a new bug to reject the incorrect syntax... Fixed and released for 3.3 M1 in HEAD. Verified for 3.3 M1 using build I20060804-0010. |