Attachment 462 Details for Bug 11125 – Because we needed this API for our implementation, we made the necessary changes ourselves. They may or may not be interesting to implementors of this feature.

Because we needed this API for our implementation, we made the necessary changes ourselves. They may or may not be interesting to implementors of this feature.

changes.txt (text/plain), 2.83 KB, created by Luc Bourlier

on 2002-03-11 15:35:29 EST

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Luc Bourlier

Created: 2002-03-11 15:35:29 EST

Size: 2.83 KB

patch

obsolete

>AST:
>  public static CompilationUnit parseCompilationUnit(char[] source, String unitName, IJavaProject javaProject, boolean resolveBindings) {
>        
>    CompilationUnitDeclaration compilationUnitDeclaration = null;
>
>    if (resolveBindings) {
>      // If resolveBindings is true, we need to record the mod count
>      // once newAST has been constructed. If the mod count goes above
>      // this level, someone is modifying the AST and all bets are off
>      // regarding resolved bindings. All existing binding info should be
>      // discarded, and the various public resolveBinding methods should
>      // thereafter return null.
>      try {
>        compilationUnitDeclaration = CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(
>          source, unitName, javaProject,
>          new AbstractSyntaxTreeVisitorAdapter());
>        if (compilationUnitDeclaration != null && source != null) {
>          ASTConverter converter = new ASTConverter(true);
>          AST ast = new AST();
>          ast.setBindingResolver(new DefaultBindingResolver(compilationUnitDeclaration.scope));
>          converter.setAST(ast);
>          CompilationUnit cu = converter.convert(compilationUnitDeclaration, source);
>          // line end table should be extracted from scanner
>          cu.setLineEndTable(compilationUnitDeclaration.compilationResult.lineSeparatorPositions);
>        
>          // line end table should be extracted from scanner
>          //cu.setLineEndTable(parser.scanner.lineEnds);
>          return cu;
>        } else {
>          return null;
>        }
>      } catch(JavaModelException e) {
>      }
>    } else {
>      return parseCompilationUnit(source);
>    }
>    return null;
>  }
>
>
>CompilationUnitResolver:
>  protected static INameEnvironment getNameEnvironment(IJavaProject javaProject)
>    throws JavaModelException {
>    return (SearchableEnvironment) ((JavaProject)javaProject).getSearchableNameEnvironment();
>  }
>  
>  public static CompilationUnitDeclaration resolve(
>    char[] source, String unitName, IJavaProject javaProject,
>    IAbstractSyntaxTreeVisitor visitor)
>    throws JavaModelException {
>
>    CompilationUnitResolver compilationUnitVisitor =
>      new CompilationUnitResolver(
>        getNameEnvironment(javaProject),
>        getHandlingPolicy(),
>        JavaCore.getOptions(),
>        getRequestor(),
>        getProblemFactory(visitor));
>
>    CompilationUnitDeclaration unit = null;
>    try {
>      String encoding = (String) JavaCore.getOptions().get(CompilerOptions.OPTION_Encoding);
>      if ("".equals(encoding)) encoding = null; //$NON-NLS-1$
>      
>      unit =
>        compilationUnitVisitor.resolve(
>          new BasicCompilationUnit(
>            source,
>            unitName,
>            encoding));
>      return unit;
>    } finally {
>      if (unit != null) {
>        unit.cleanUp();
>      }
>    }
>  }

Actions: View

Attachments on bug 11125: 462