View | Details | Raw Unified | Return to bug 141155 | Differences between
and this patch

Collapse All | Expand All

(-)src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/compiler/regression/EnumTest.java (-4 / +4 lines)
Lines 2443-2450 Link Here
2443
2443
2444
		String[] expectedOutputs = new String[] {
2444
		String[] expectedOutputs = new String[] {
2445
			"  private strictfp X(java.lang.String arg0, int arg1);\n",
2445
			"  private strictfp X(java.lang.String arg0, int arg1);\n",
2446
			"  public static final strictfp X[] values();\n",
2446
			"  public static strictfp X[] values();\n",
2447
			"  public static final strictfp X valueOf(java.lang.String arg0);\n"
2447
			"  public static strictfp X valueOf(java.lang.String arg0);\n"
2448
		};
2448
		};
2449
2449
2450
		ClassFileBytesDisassembler disassembler = ToolFactory.createDefaultClassFileBytesDisassembler();
2450
		ClassFileBytesDisassembler disassembler = ToolFactory.createDefaultClassFileBytesDisassembler();
Lines 2932-2938 Link Here
2932
			"  \n" + 
2932
			"  \n" + 
2933
			"  // Method descriptor #21 ()[LX;\n" + 
2933
			"  // Method descriptor #21 ()[LX;\n" + 
2934
			"  // Stack: 5, Locals: 3\n" + 
2934
			"  // Stack: 5, Locals: 3\n" + 
2935
			"  public static final X[] values();\n" + 
2935
			"  public static X[] values();\n" + 
2936
			"     0  getstatic X.ENUM$VALUES : X[] [10]\n" + 
2936
			"     0  getstatic X.ENUM$VALUES : X[] [10]\n" + 
2937
			"     3  dup\n" + 
2937
			"     3  dup\n" + 
2938
			"     4  astore_0\n" + 
2938
			"     4  astore_0\n" + 
Lines 2954-2960 Link Here
2954
			"  \n" + 
2954
			"  \n" + 
2955
			"  // Method descriptor #29 (Ljava/lang/String;)LX;\n" + 
2955
			"  // Method descriptor #29 (Ljava/lang/String;)LX;\n" + 
2956
			"  // Stack: 3, Locals: 4\n" + 
2956
			"  // Stack: 3, Locals: 4\n" + 
2957
			"  public static final X valueOf(java.lang.String arg0);\n" + 
2957
			"  public static X valueOf(java.lang.String arg0);\n" + 
2958
			"     0  getstatic X.ENUM$VALUES : X[] [10]\n" + 
2958
			"     0  getstatic X.ENUM$VALUES : X[] [10]\n" + 
2959
			"     3  dup\n" + 
2959
			"     3  dup\n" + 
2960
			"     4  astore_1\n" + 
2960
			"     4  astore_1\n" + 

Return to bug 141155