Attachment 172318 Details for Bug 195346 – updated patch

[patch] updated patch

patch195346.txt (text/plain), 17.83 KB, created by Ayushman Jain

on 2010-06-21 08:05:54 EDT

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Ayushman Jain

Created: 2010-06-21 08:05:54 EDT

Size: 17.83 KB

patch

obsolete

>### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0
>#P org.eclipse.jdt.core
>Index: codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/CompletionEngine.java
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.jdt.core/codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/CompletionEngine.java,v
>retrieving revision 1.413
>diff -u -r1.413 CompletionEngine.java
>--- codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/CompletionEngine.java	21 Jun 2010 07:52:34 -0000	1.413
>+++ codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/CompletionEngine.java	21 Jun 2010 12:02:18 -0000
>@@ -523,6 +523,7 @@
> 	boolean assistNodeIsInterfaceExcludingAnnotation; // https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=310423
> 	int  assistNodeInJavadoc = 0;
> 	boolean assistNodeCanBeSingleMemberAnnotation = false;
>+	boolean assistNodeIsInsideCase = false; // https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=195346
> 	
> 	long targetedElement;
> 	
>@@ -2860,6 +2861,21 @@
> 		return false;
> 	}
> 	
>+	private boolean assistNodeIsInsideCase(ASTNode astNode, ASTNode astNodeParent) {
>+		// To find whether we're completing inside the case expression in a 
>+		// switch case construct (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=195346)
>+		if (astNodeParent instanceof SwitchStatement) {
>+			CaseStatement[] cases = ((SwitchStatement) astNodeParent).cases;
>+			for (int i = 0, caseCount = ((SwitchStatement) astNodeParent).caseCount; i < caseCount; i++) {
>+				CompletionNodeDetector detector = new CompletionNodeDetector(astNode, cases[i]);
>+				if (detector.containsCompletionNode()) {
>+					return true;
>+				}
>+			}
>+		}
>+		return false;
>+	}
>+
> 	private void completionOnQualifiedAllocationExpression(ASTNode astNode, Binding qualifiedBinding, Scope scope) {
> 		setSourceAndTokenRange(astNode.sourceStart, astNode.sourceEnd, false);
> 
>@@ -2916,6 +2932,7 @@
> 			(CompletionOnQualifiedNameReference) astNode;
> 		this.completionToken = ref.completionIdentifier;
> 		long completionPosition = ref.sourcePositions[ref.sourcePositions.length - 1];
>+		this.assistNodeIsInsideCase = assistNodeIsInsideCase(astNode, this.parser.assistNodeParent);
> 
> 		if (qualifiedBinding.problemId() == ProblemReasons.NotFound) {
> 			setSourceAndTokenRange((int) (completionPosition >>> 32), (int) completionPosition);
>@@ -3060,7 +3077,8 @@
> 		this.assistNodeIsSuperType = ref.isSuperType();
> 		this.assistNodeIsExtendedType = assistNodeIsExtendedType(astNode, astNodeParent);
> 		this.assistNodeIsInterfaceExcludingAnnotation = assistNodeIsInterfaceExcludingAnnotation(astNode, astNodeParent);
>-
>+		this.assistNodeIsInsideCase = assistNodeIsInsideCase(astNode, astNodeParent);
>+		
> 		this.completionToken = ref.completionIdentifier;
> 		long completionPosition = ref.sourcePositions[ref.tokens.length];
> 
>@@ -3120,6 +3138,7 @@
> 		CompletionOnSingleNameReference singleNameReference = (CompletionOnSingleNameReference) astNode;
> 		this.completionToken = singleNameReference.token;
> 		SwitchStatement switchStatement = astNodeParent instanceof SwitchStatement ? (SwitchStatement) astNodeParent : null;
>+		this.assistNodeIsInsideCase = assistNodeIsInsideCase(astNode, astNodeParent);
> 		if (switchStatement != null
> 				&& switchStatement.expression.resolvedType != null
> 				&& switchStatement.expression.resolvedType.isEnum()) {
>@@ -3195,7 +3214,8 @@
> 		this.assistNodeIsSuperType = singleRef.isSuperType();
> 		this.assistNodeIsExtendedType = assistNodeIsExtendedType(astNode, astNodeParent);
> 		this.assistNodeIsInterfaceExcludingAnnotation = assistNodeIsInterfaceExcludingAnnotation(astNode, astNodeParent);
>-
>+		this.assistNodeIsInsideCase = assistNodeIsInsideCase(astNode, astNodeParent);
>+		
> 		// can be the start of a qualified type name
> 		if (qualifiedBinding == null) {
> 			if (this.completionToken.length == 0 &&
>@@ -4105,6 +4125,13 @@
> 		}
> 		return 0;
> 	}
>+	
>+	private int computeRelevanceForFinal(boolean onlyFinal, boolean isFinal) {
>+		if (onlyFinal && isFinal) {
>+			return R_FINAL;
>+		}
>+		return 0;
>+	}
> 
> 	private long computeTargetedElement(CompletionOnAnnotationOfType fakeNode) {
> 		ASTNode annotatedElement = fakeNode.potentialAnnotatedNode;
>@@ -5968,6 +5995,11 @@
> 			if (this.options.checkVisibility
> 				&& !field.canBeSeenBy(receiverType, invocationSite, scope))	continue next;
> 			
>+			// don't propose array types in case expression
>+			// https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=195346
>+			if (this.assistNodeIsInsideCase && field.type instanceof ArrayBinding)
>+				continue next;
>+			
> 			int ptr = this.uninterestingBindingsPtr;
> 			// Cases where the binding is uninteresting eg. for completion occurring inside a field declaration,
> 			// the field binding is uninteresting and shouldn't be proposed.
>@@ -6064,6 +6096,7 @@
> 			relevance += computeRelevanceForExpectingType(field.type);
> 			relevance += computeRelevanceForEnumConstant(field.type);
> 			relevance += computeRelevanceForStatic(onlyStaticFields, field.isStatic());
>+			relevance += computeRelevanceForFinal(this.assistNodeIsInsideCase, field.isFinal());
> 			relevance += computeRelevanceForQualification(prefixRequired);
> 			relevance += computeRelevanceForRestrictions(IAccessRule.K_ACCESSIBLE);
> 			if (onlyStaticFields && this.insideQualifiedReference) {
>@@ -11353,6 +11386,11 @@
> 
> 							if (local.isSecret())
> 								continue next;
>+												
>+							// don't propose array types in case expression
>+							// https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=195346
>+							if (this.assistNodeIsInsideCase && local.type instanceof ArrayBinding)
>+								continue next;
> 							
> 							int ptr = this.uninterestingBindingsPtr;
> 							// Cases where the binding is uninteresting eg. for completion occurring inside a local var
>@@ -11380,6 +11418,7 @@
> 							relevance += computeRelevanceForEnumConstant(local.type);
> 							relevance += computeRelevanceForQualification(false);
> 							relevance += computeRelevanceForRestrictions(IAccessRule.K_ACCESSIBLE); // no access restriction for local variable
>+							relevance += computeRelevanceForFinal(this.assistNodeIsInsideCase, local.isFinal());
> 							this.noProposal = false;
> 							if(!this.requestor.isIgnored(CompletionProposal.LOCAL_VARIABLE_REF)) {
> 								InternalCompletionProposal proposal =  createProposal(CompletionProposal.LOCAL_VARIABLE_REF, this.actualCompletionPosition);
>Index: codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/RelevanceConstants.java
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.jdt.core/codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/RelevanceConstants.java,v
>retrieving revision 1.37
>diff -u -r1.37 RelevanceConstants.java
>--- codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/RelevanceConstants.java	9 Jul 2009 10:47:41 -0000	1.37
>+++ codeassist/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/codeassist/RelevanceConstants.java	21 Jun 2010 12:02:18 -0000
>@@ -53,4 +53,5 @@
> 	int R_NO_PROBLEMS = 1;
> 	int R_RESOLVED = 1;
> 	int R_TARGET = 5;
>+	int R_FINAL = 3; // https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=195346
> }
>#P org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model
>Index: src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/CompletionTests.java
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model/src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/CompletionTests.java,v
>retrieving revision 1.220
>diff -u -r1.220 CompletionTests.java
>--- src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/CompletionTests.java	21 Jun 2010 07:13:29 -0000	1.220
>+++ src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/CompletionTests.java	21 Jun 2010 12:03:55 -0000
>@@ -1897,7 +1897,7 @@
> 	this.workingCopies[0].codeComplete(cursorLocation, requestor, this.wcOwner);
> 
> 	assertResults(
>-			"zzz[FIELD_REF]{zzz, LCompletionAfterCase1;, I, zzz, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}",
>+			"zzz[FIELD_REF]{zzz, LCompletionAfterCase1;, I, zzz, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}",
> 			requestor.getResults());
> }
> public void testCompletionAfterCase2() throws JavaModelException {
>@@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@
> 	this.workingCopies[0].codeComplete(cursorLocation, requestor, this.wcOwner);
> 
> 	assertResults(
>-			"zzz[FIELD_REF]{zzz, LCompletionAfterCase2;, I, zzz, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}",
>+			"zzz[FIELD_REF]{zzz, LCompletionAfterCase2;, I, zzz, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}",
> 			requestor.getResults());
> }
> //https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=111882
>@@ -1952,13 +1952,11 @@
> 	this.workingCopies[0].codeComplete(cursorLocation, requestor, this.wcOwner);
> 
> 	assertResults(
>-			"ZZZ2[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ2, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, J, ZZZ2, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ3[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ3, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, D, ZZZ3, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ4[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ4, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, Ljava.lang.Object;, ZZZ4, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ5[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ5, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, [I, ZZZ5, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ6[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ6, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, [Ljava.lang.Object;, ZZZ6, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ7[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ7, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, S, ZZZ7, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ1[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ1, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, I, ZZZ1, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}",
>+			"ZZZ2[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ2, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, J, ZZZ2, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ3[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ3, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, D, ZZZ3, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ4[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ4, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, Ljava.lang.Object;, ZZZ4, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ7[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ7, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, S, ZZZ7, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ1[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ1, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, I, ZZZ1, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}",
> 			requestor.getResults());
> }
> //https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=111882
>@@ -1995,13 +1993,11 @@
> 	this.workingCopies[0].codeComplete(cursorLocation, requestor, this.wcOwner);
> 
> 	assertResults(
>-			"ZZZ2[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ2, Ltest.TestConstants;, J, ZZZ2, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ3[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ3, Ltest.TestConstants;, D, ZZZ3, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ4[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ4, Ltest.TestConstants;, Ljava.lang.Object;, ZZZ4, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ5[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ5, Ltest.TestConstants;, [I, ZZZ5, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ6[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ6, Ltest.TestConstants;, [Ljava.lang.Object;, ZZZ6, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ7[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ7, Ltest.TestConstants;, S, ZZZ7, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>-			"ZZZ1[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ1, Ltest.TestConstants;, I, ZZZ1, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED+ R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}",
>+			"ZZZ2[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ2, Ltest.TestConstants;, J, ZZZ2, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ3[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ3, Ltest.TestConstants;, D, ZZZ3, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ4[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ4, Ltest.TestConstants;, Ljava.lang.Object;, ZZZ4, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ7[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ7, Ltest.TestConstants;, S, ZZZ7, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"ZZZ1[FIELD_REF]{ZZZ1, Ltest.TestConstants;, I, ZZZ1, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_CASE + R_QUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_FINAL) + "}",
> 			requestor.getResults());
> }
> //https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=222080
>@@ -21378,4 +21374,84 @@
> 			"myVar1[LOCAL_VARIABLE_REF]{myVar1, null, I, myVar1, null, 57}",
> 			requestor.getResults());
> }
>+
>+// https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=195346
>+// To verify that array types aren't proposed inside case, and also
>+// that finals have a higher priority in suggestions inside case expressions.
>+public void testBug195346a() throws JavaModelException {
>+	this.workingCopies = new ICompilationUnit[1];
>+	this.workingCopies[0] = getWorkingCopy(
>+		"/Completion/src/test/CompletionAfterCase2.java",
>+		"package test;\n" +
>+		"public class CompletionAfterCase2 {\n" +
>+		"	static char[] AN_ARRAY = new char[10];\n" +
>+		"	static int AN_INT_VALUE = 0;\n" +
>+		"	static final int AN_INT_VALUE2 = 0;\n" +
>+		"	static final char[] AN_ARRAY2 = {'a','b'};\n" +
>+		"	static final int[] AN_INT_ARRAY = null;\n" +
>+		"	static final Object[] ANOTHER_ARRAY = null;\n" +
>+		"	void foo(int i, final int [] AN_ARRAY_PARAM){\n" +
>+		"		final int AN_INT_VAR = 1;\n" +
>+		"		final int[] AN_ARRAY_VAR = {1};\n" +
>+		"		int AN_INT_VAR2 = 1;\n" +
>+		"		switch(i) {\n" +
>+		"			case AN\n" +
>+		"		}\n" +
>+		"	}\n" +
>+		"}\n");
>+
>+	CompletionTestsRequestor2 requestor = new CompletionTestsRequestor2(true);
>+	String str = this.workingCopies[0].getSource();
>+	String completeBehind = "AN";
>+	int cursorLocation = str.lastIndexOf(completeBehind) + completeBehind.length();
>+	this.workingCopies[0].codeComplete(cursorLocation, requestor, this.wcOwner);
>+
>+	assertResults(
>+			"AN_INT_VALUE[FIELD_REF]{AN_INT_VALUE, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, I, AN_INT_VALUE, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE) + "}\n" +
>+			"AN_INT_VAR2[LOCAL_VARIABLE_REF]{AN_INT_VAR2, null, I, AN_INT_VAR2, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE) + "}\n" +
>+			"AN_INT_VALUE2[FIELD_REF]{AN_INT_VALUE2, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, I, AN_INT_VALUE2, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_FINAL) + "}\n" +
>+			"AN_INT_VAR[LOCAL_VARIABLE_REF]{AN_INT_VAR, null, I, AN_INT_VAR, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_RESOLVED + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_FINAL) + "}",
>+			requestor.getResults());
>+}
>+
>+// https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=195346
>+// To verify that array types aren't proposed inside case, and also
>+// that finals have a higher priority in suggestions inside case expressions.
>+public void testBug195346b() throws JavaModelException {
>+	this.workingCopies = new ICompilationUnit[1];
>+	this.workingCopies[0] = getWorkingCopy(
>+		"/Completion/src/test/CompletionAfterCase2.java",
>+		"package test;\n" +
>+		"public class CompletionAfterCase2 {\n" +
>+		"	class AN_INNER_CLASS {\n" +
>+		"		static final int abc = 1;\n" +
>+		"	}\n" +
>+		"	static char[] AN_ARRAY = new char[10];\n" +
>+		"	static int AN_INT_VALUE = 0;\n" +
>+		"	static final int AN_INT_VALUE2 = 0;\n" +
>+		"	static final char[] AN_ARRAY2 = {'a','b'};\n" +
>+		"	static final int[] AN_INT_ARRAY = null;\n" +
>+		"	static final Object[] ANOTHER_ARRAY = null;\n" +
>+		"	void foo(int i, final int [] AN_ARRAY_PARAM){\n" +
>+		"		final int AN_INT_VAR = 1;\n" +
>+		"		final int[] AN_ARRAY_VAR = {1};\n" +
>+		"		int AN_INT_VAR2 = 1;\n" +
>+		"		switch(i) {\n" +
>+		"			case CompletionAfterCase2.AN\n" +
>+		"		}\n" +
>+		"	}\n" +
>+		"}\n");
>+
>+	CompletionTestsRequestor2 requestor = new CompletionTestsRequestor2(true);
>+	String str = this.workingCopies[0].getSource();
>+	String completeBehind = "AN";
>+	int cursorLocation = str.lastIndexOf(completeBehind) + completeBehind.length();
>+	this.workingCopies[0].codeComplete(cursorLocation, requestor, this.wcOwner);
>+
>+	assertResults(
>+			"CompletionAfterCase2.AN_INNER_CLASS[TYPE_REF]{AN_INNER_CLASS, test, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2$AN_INNER_CLASS;, null, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED) + "}\n" +
>+			"AN_INT_VALUE[FIELD_REF]{AN_INT_VALUE, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, I, AN_INT_VALUE, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE) + "}\n" +
>+			"AN_INT_VALUE2[FIELD_REF]{AN_INT_VALUE2, Ltest.CompletionAfterCase2;, I, AN_INT_VALUE2, null, " + (R_DEFAULT + R_INTERESTING + R_CASE + R_UNQUALIFIED + R_NON_RESTRICTED + R_EXACT_EXPECTED_TYPE + R_FINAL) + "}",
>+			requestor.getResults());
>+}
> }

Actions: View | Diff

Attachments on bug 195346: 170505 | 170675 | 172318