Attachment #16214 for bug #78914

Lines 1019-1024 Link Here

(-)compiler/org/eclipse/jdt/core/compiler/IProblem.java (+2 lines)
1019	int IllegalQualifiedEnumConstantLabel = FieldRelated + 755;	1019	int IllegalQualifiedEnumConstantLabel = FieldRelated + 755;
1020	/** @since 3.1 */	1020	/** @since 3.1 */
1021	int CannotExtendEnum = TypeRelated + 756;	1021	int CannotExtendEnum = TypeRelated + 756;
		1022	/** @since 3.1 */
		1023	int ExplicitConstructorCallCannotBeUsedInEnum = MethodRelated + 757;
1022		1024
1023	/**	1025	/**
1024	* Var args	1026	* Var args

Lines 264-269 Link Here

(-)compiler/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/ast/ExplicitConstructorCall.java (-3 / +4 lines)
264	return;	264	return;
265	}	265	}
266		266
		267	if (receiverType.erasure().id == T_JavaLangEnum) {
		268	scope.problemReporter().explicitConstructorCallCannotBeUsedInEnum(this);
		269	return;
		270	}
267	// qualification should be from the type of the enclosingType	271	// qualification should be from the type of the enclosingType
268	if (qualification != null) {	272	if (qualification != null) {
269	if (accessMode != Super) {	273	if (accessMode != Super) {
Lines 317-325 Link Here
317	if (argHasError) {	321	if (argHasError) {
318	return;	322	return;
319	}	323	}
320	} else if (receiverType.erasure().id == T_JavaLangEnum) {
321	// TODO (philippe) get rid of once well-known binding is available
322	argumentTypes = new TypeBinding[] { scope.getJavaLangString(), BaseTypes.IntBinding };
323	}	324	}
324	if ((binding = scope.getConstructor(receiverType, argumentTypes, this)).isValidBinding()) {	325	if ((binding = scope.getConstructor(receiverType, argumentTypes, this)).isValidBinding()) {
325	if (isMethodUseDeprecated(binding, scope))	326	if (isMethodUseDeprecated(binding, scope))

Lines 1083-1088 Link Here

(-)compiler/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/problem/ProblemReporter.java (+8 lines)
1083	reference.sourceStart,	1083	reference.sourceStart,
1084	reference.sourceEnd);	1084	reference.sourceEnd);
1085	}	1085	}
		1086	public void explicitConstructorCallCannotBeUsedInEnum(ExplicitConstructorCall constructorCall) {
		1087	this.handle(
		1088	IProblem.ExplicitConstructorCallCannotBeUsedInEnum,
		1089	NoArgument,
		1090	NoArgument,
		1091	constructorCall.sourceStart,
		1092	constructorCall.sourceEnd);
		1093	}
1086	public void expressionShouldBeAVariable(Expression expression) {	1094	public void expressionShouldBeAVariable(Expression expression) {
1087	this.handle(	1095	this.handle(
1088	IProblem.ExpressionShouldBeAVariable,	1096	IProblem.ExpressionShouldBeAVariable,

Lines 494-499 Link Here

(-)compiler/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/problem/messages.properties (+1 lines)
494	754 = The enum {1} already defines the method {0}({2}) implicitly	494	754 = The enum {1} already defines the method {0}({2}) implicitly
495	755 = Cannot qualify the name of the enum constant {0} in a case label	495	755 = Cannot qualify the name of the enum constant {0} in a case label
496	756 = The type {1} may not subclass {0} explicitly	496	756 = The type {1} may not subclass {0} explicitly
		497	757 = Explicit constructor call is not allowed in enum constructor
497		498
498		499
499	### VARARGS	500	### VARARGS

Return to bug 78914