<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Eclipse Wonk Winks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wonk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wonk</link>
	<description>Blogging open source Eclipse</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Atf? Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms? All The Fun? No! JavaScript, Ajax and DHTML editor and debugger&#8230; by Philippe Ombredanne</title>
		<link>http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wonk/2007/10/02/atf-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms-all-the-fun-no-javascript-ajax-and-dhtml-editor-and-debugger/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Ombredanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wonk/2007/10/02/atf-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms-all-the-fun-no-javascript-ajax-and-dhtml-editor-and-debugger/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think this is historic.
At start there were no editors.  So JavaScript, CSS and HTML were provided by WTP.
The new JavaScript editor is based on a JDT fork.
But still no CSS or HTML. It relies on WTP base editors.

I think that there absolutely no reason to build it on top of WTP code, and have tight coupling.

The fact that the project is part of WTP, and the fact that WTP components are tightly coupled or not should not be linked.

I sometimes feel that WTP is way too monolithic. :-)

Note that for now, ATF depends only on a very small subset of the WST (non J2EE part of WTP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is historic.<br />
At start there were no editors.  So JavaScript, CSS and HTML were provided by WTP.<br />
The new JavaScript editor is based on a JDT fork.<br />
But still no CSS or HTML. It relies on WTP base editors.</p>
<p>I think that there absolutely no reason to build it on top of WTP code, and have tight coupling.</p>
<p>The fact that the project is part of WTP, and the fact that WTP components are tightly coupled or not should not be linked.</p>
<p>I sometimes feel that WTP is way too monolithic. <img src='http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wonk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Note that for now, ATF depends only on a very small subset of the WST (non J2EE part of WTP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atf? Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms? All The Fun? No! JavaScript, Ajax and DHTML editor and debugger&#8230; by Eugene Kuleshov</title>
		<link>http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wonk/2007/10/02/atf-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms-all-the-fun-no-javascript-ajax-and-dhtml-editor-and-debugger/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Kuleshov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wonk/2007/10/02/atf-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms-all-the-fun-no-javascript-ajax-and-dhtml-editor-and-debugger/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>What been bugging me about ATF is why does it need to be built on top of WTP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What been bugging me about ATF is why does it need to be built on top of WTP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
