Comments for Seva at Eclipse http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva Seva Lapsha working on Eclipse PDT project Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:50:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 Comment on Eclipse Galileo RC1 Update Manager RT Equinox P2 is still not good enough for me yet by Ben Vitale http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/05/21/eclipse-galileo-rc1-update-manager-rt-equinox-p2-still-sucks/#comment-646 Ben Vitale Thu, 21 May 2009 18:29:13 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=65#comment-646 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277242 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277242

]]> Comment on Eclipse Galileo RC1 Update Manager RT Equinox P2 is still not good enough for me yet by Mark Melvin http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/05/21/eclipse-galileo-rc1-update-manager-rt-equinox-p2-still-sucks/#comment-642 Mark Melvin Thu, 21 May 2009 03:26:05 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=65#comment-642 Weird. What is the bug number? I was messing with exactly the same thing today (installing JDT into a bare platform, both RC1) and it seemed to work fine for me. I'd be interested in this bug. Weird. What is the bug number? I was messing with exactly the same thing today (installing JDT into a bare platform, both RC1) and it seemed to work fine for me. I’d be interested in this bug.

]]> Comment on Eclipse Galileo RC1 Update Manager RT Equinox P2 is still not good enough for me yet by Pascal Rapicault http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/05/21/eclipse-galileo-rc1-update-manager-rt-equinox-p2-still-sucks/#comment-641 Pascal Rapicault Thu, 21 May 2009 01:15:19 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=65#comment-641 Sorry you are right the bug is opened. You opened it as you were blogging. Note that at stage of the installation, no jdt bundles should have been installed and there should be no need to revert. <b>Seva:</b> I don't think I understand your point. I've got clean Eclipse Platform with nothing over it on purpose. I want just to install specific features with no additional stuff (I don't need Mylyn or CVS for instance). So according to the idea, I need to just install JDT afterward. In Ganymede it works perfectly, BTW. Sorry you are right the bug is opened. You opened it as you were blogging.
Note that at stage of the installation, no jdt bundles should have been installed and there should be no need to revert.

Seva: I don’t think I understand your point. I’ve got clean Eclipse Platform with nothing over it on purpose. I want just to install specific features with no additional stuff (I don’t need Mylyn or CVS for instance). So according to the idea, I need to just install JDT afterward. In Ganymede it works perfectly, BTW.

]]> Comment on Eclipse Galileo RC1 Update Manager RT Equinox P2 is still not good enough for me yet by Pascal Rapicault http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/05/21/eclipse-galileo-rc1-update-manager-rt-equinox-p2-still-sucks/#comment-640 Pascal Rapicault Thu, 21 May 2009 01:08:41 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=65#comment-640 Seva, I have not seen a bug reported about this error with your name. Please open one ASAP with precise steps so we can reproduce. Thx. Seva, I have not seen a bug reported about this error with your name. Please open one ASAP with precise steps so we can reproduce. Thx.

]]> Comment on Eclipse Maven Integration by Abel http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/02/20/eclipse-maven-integration/#comment-601 Abel Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:14:01 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=58#comment-601 Good to see that the number of Maven users is increasing in the Eclipse community :-). I'm sorry you evaluated q4e... the last release is a bit rusty since we have not been able to solve all the IP issues involved in the move to the Eclipse Foundation. Many improvements have been committed to the Eclipse SVN already. On the other hand, we would like to know which where your pain points with q4e (I could not find any issues on <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?product=IAM" rel="nofollow">bugzilla</a>. We area friendly bunch :-) , come and tell us what you'd like to be improved on the <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/thread.php?group=eclipse.technology.iam" rel="nofollow">newsgroup</a> or <a href="https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev" rel="nofollow">devlist</a>. <b>Seva</b>: I promise to reevaluate it again one day :) Good to see that the number of Maven users is increasing in the Eclipse community :-).

I’m sorry you evaluated q4e… the last release is a bit rusty since we have not been able to solve all the IP issues involved in the move to the Eclipse Foundation. Many improvements have been committed to the Eclipse SVN already.

On the other hand, we would like to know which where your pain points with q4e (I could not find any issues on bugzilla. We area friendly bunch :-) , come and tell us what you’d like to be improved on the newsgroup or devlist.

Seva: I promise to reevaluate it again one day :)

]]> Comment on Eclipse Maven Integration by Eugene Kuleshov http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/02/20/eclipse-maven-integration/#comment-600 Eugene Kuleshov Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:33:34 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=58#comment-600 You know that you don't need mvnrepository.org to search for your libraries? This functionality is already in m2eclipse and well integrated into the POM editor. <b>Seva:</b> Yeah, I saw it, but for some reason it just doesn't work. It only shows me the artifacts which are already configured in my projects. Anyway, I'm using Nexus to proxy all the artifacts, so the direct integration is less important. You know that you don’t need mvnrepository.org to search for your libraries? This functionality is already in m2eclipse and well integrated into the POM editor.

Seva: Yeah, I saw it, but for some reason it just doesn’t work. It only shows me the artifacts which are already configured in my projects. Anyway, I’m using Nexus to proxy all the artifacts, so the direct integration is less important.

]]> Comment on Aptana “steals” PDT code by Seva Lapsha http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/01/05/aptana-steals-pdt-code/#comment-582 Seva Lapsha Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:19:55 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=53#comment-582 To clarify the situation a bit - please refer to my comment <a href="http://sevalapsha.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/aptana-steals-pdt-code/#comments" rel="nofollow">here</a>. To clarify the situation a bit - please refer to my comment here.

]]> Comment on Aptana “steals” PDT code by maarten meijer http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/01/05/aptana-steals-pdt-code/#comment-572 maarten meijer Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:08:35 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=53#comment-572 They "package" a lot somewhat different making everything duplicate. They miss the point of eclipse I think. Example: I have up to date Subclipse installed, but Aptana "insists" on installing again in their "own" version. All I wanted is their PHP editor... They “package” a lot somewhat different making everything duplicate. They miss the point of eclipse I think. Example: I have up to date Subclipse installed, but Aptana “insists” on installing again in their “own” version. All I wanted is their PHP editor…

]]> Comment on Aptana “steals” PDT code by Chris Aniszczyk http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/01/05/aptana-steals-pdt-code/#comment-571 Chris Aniszczyk Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:08:06 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=53#comment-571 They must be changing something other than package names. If they are, shouldn't they be contributing the changes back to PDT? Or at least the patches of their changes to PDT should be public, due to the EPL. They must be changing something other than package names. If they are, shouldn’t they be contributing the changes back to PDT? Or at least the patches of their changes to PDT should be public, due to the EPL.

]]> Comment on Aptana “steals” PDT code by Vineet Sinha http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/2009/01/05/aptana-steals-pdt-code/#comment-570 Vineet Sinha Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:15:36 +0000 http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/seva/?p=53#comment-570 Ummm.... I don't get it. Stealing refers to taking property without permission. The Eclipse foundation was created to support open source and intended for others to use the code. The only potential moral problem I can imagine would be if Aptana claimed that they wrote the code themselves - but your (and Zend's) name is on it and they did not even remove that. Infact, Aptana makes all their code open source as well - so I can't imagine anyone complaining about it. Vineet Ummm…. I don’t get it.

Stealing refers to taking property without permission. The Eclipse foundation was created to support open source and intended for others to use the code.

The only potential moral problem I can imagine would be if Aptana claimed that they wrote the code themselves - but your (and Zend’s) name is on it and they did not even remove that.

Infact, Aptana makes all their code open source as well - so I can’t imagine anyone complaining about it.

Vineet

]]>